Why Zambian Govt must step back from Edgar Lungu’s burial

Posted on by admin

Airtel Malawi

……When compassion fails

The death of a former president is ordinarily a moment of national reflection, unity, and respect.

Capital One

It is a time when a country collectively honors the contributions and sacrifices of its past leaders, setting aside political differences in acknowledgment of shared history.

However, the case of Edgar Lungu, Zambia’s late president, presents a starkly different scenario—one that demands critical examination of the government’s role during his final days and the ethical implications of its involvement in his state funeral.

Edgar Lungu’s passing in June 2025 has been met with an unusual and uncomfortable silence from many quarters, not least from the current government under President Hakainde Hichilema.

This silence is not only about the delay in his burial, which remains unresolved months after his death, but also about the profound dissonance between how Lungu was treated during his illness and how the state now seeks to honor him in death.

To understand why it is imperative for President Hichilema’s government to abstain from participating in the burial of Edgar Lungu, one must look closely at the treatment Lungu received while bedridden.

It is well documented that the government stripped him of all privileges ordinarily accorded to former heads of state.

This was not a mere political distancing or symbolic rebuke; it was a tangible withdrawal of support and dignity.

The government denied him his medical entitlements, forcing his family to shoulder the burden of hospital bills and healthcare costs.

This abandonment was not only a breach of protocol but also a profound moral failure.

The legal arguments presented in court by Lungu’s family highlight this glaring contradiction.

They pointed out the glaring hypocrisy in seeking to accord Lungu a state funeral—a mark of honor and respect—when, during his lifetime, the very government now orchestrating this honor denied him the rights and privileges that justified such a send-off.

The family’s lawyer posed a powerful question: How could a government that deliberately withdrew medical support and stripped entitlements from a former president suddenly claim to mourn his death with a state funeral? This question strikes at the heart of the issue and demands a response grounded in sincerity rather than political expediency.

The optics of the government’s involvement in the funeral are troubling.

Rather than being seen as a gesture of respect or remorse, it risks being interpreted as an opportunistic celebration of Lungu’s demise—an event that some might view as a political victory for President Hichilema.

This perception is fueled by the government’s previous actions, which appeared to have been aimed at hastening Lungu’s exit by denying him the care he was entitled to.

Such an interpretation casts a long shadow over the funeral proceedings, robbing them of the solemnity and dignity they should command.

Moreover, the government’s insistence on taking part in the burial could be deeply hurtful to Lungu’s family and supporters.

The family, who bore the financial and emotional burden of his final days, deserve the space and respect to mourn their loved one without the political overtones that the government’s presence inevitably brings.

The burial should be a private, dignified affair led by those who cared for Lungu most intimately—not a stage for political grandstanding.

The courts have a critical role to play in this delicate matter.

They must weigh the arguments of the Lungu family with empathy and fairness, recognizing that despite Lungu’s status as a former president, the government’s treatment of him was far from that of a respected statesman.

The legal system should safeguard the rights of the deceased’s family to conduct the burial according to their wishes, free from unnecessary state interference that could compound their grief.

This situation also raises broader questions about how societies treat their former leaders and the ethical responsibilities of governments beyond political cycles.

Stripping a former president of privileges and denying medical care is not just an administrative decision—it is a reflection of a deeper erosion of respect for the office and the individual who once held it.

Such actions risk setting dangerous precedents for future leadership transitions, undermining national unity and the very fabric of democratic governance.

The Zambian government’s conduct during Edgar Lungu’s illness and subsequent death reveals a troubling disregard for human dignity and respect. By denying him the medical care he was entitled to, the government effectively contributed to his demise.

This reality cannot be ignored or whitewashed by a state funeral that lacks genuine remorse or compassion.

The government should honor the memory of Edgar Lungu by stepping back and allowing his family to mourn and bury him with the dignity they deserve, free from political interference.

True respect for a former leader is shown not only in death but in the compassion extended during their final days—a lesson that Zambia’s current government must seriously reflect upon.

Edgar Lungu died in June 2025, but his burial remains unresolved.

The time has come for the government to recognize the pain it has caused and to act with humility by letting the family lead the way in honoring their lost loved one.

Only then can Zambia begin to heal from this painful chapter in its history.

Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Chakwera MCP’s Govt fuel mismanagement exposed, DPP steps up to restore stability

Posted on by admin

Matola (Energy Minister), Chakwera and motorists spending nights for fuel

Airtel Malawi

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-Malawi finds itself grappling with a severe fuel shortage that has paralyzed key sectors of its economy and disrupted the daily lives of its citizens.

At the heart of this crisis lies a troubling legacy of mismanagement and corruption linked to the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) government under former President Lazarus Chakwera.

Capital One

As the nation struggles to fill its empty fuel reserves, which have been depleted since July 2024, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has stepped forward with decisive action aimed at stabilizing the situation and restoring confidence in the country’s energy security.

The roots of the current fuel shortage run deep, tracing back to the MCP administration’s failure to effectively manage the National Oil Company of Malawi (NOCMA) and maintain adequate fuel reserves.

Our investigations reveal that the MCP regime allowed systemic corruption and financial malfeasance to fester unchecked within the fuel supply chain.

The siphoning off of an estimated 22 billion kwacha through questionable fuel suppliers under MCP’s watch was not merely a case of poor planning but a deliberate plundering of resources that were critical for sustaining Malawi’s energy needs.

This corruption scandal exposed the fragile underbelly of Malawi’s fuel infrastructure.

Instead of safeguarding the country’s reserves and ensuring steady fuel availability, the MCP administration’s cadres allegedly prioritized personal gain over national interest.

The consequences have been dire: since mid-2024, Malawi’s fuel reserves have been empty, leaving the nation vulnerable to economic shocks and operational paralysis in sectors dependent on reliable energy supplies.

Citizens have borne the brunt of this crisis, facing soaring transport costs, scarcity of essential goods, and an uncertain economic future.

In stark contrast, the DPP government, now at the helm, has adopted a markedly different approach to tackling the crisis.

Recognizing the gravity of the situation, the new administration has prioritized transparency and accountability as fundamental pillars in restoring Malawi’s fuel security.

The DPP has initiated comprehensive audits of NOCMA’s operations to uncover the full extent of mismanagement and corruption inherited from the previous regime.

These audits are crucial for identifying weaknesses and enforcing corrective measures that prevent a repeat of such a debilitating crisis.

Moreover, the DPP has emphasized the importance of stringent oversight mechanisms to ensure that fuel procurement and distribution processes are conducted with integrity.

By instituting rigorous vetting procedures for suppliers and empowering independent watchdogs to monitor NOCMA’s activities, the current government is sending a clear message that graft and embezzlement will no longer be tolerated.

This proactive stance is not only stabilizing the immediate fuel supply but also laying the groundwork for sustainable management practices that can safeguard Malawi’s energy future.

The economic stakes could not be higher. Should the fuel shortage have persisted unchecked, Malawi’s economy would have faced catastrophic disruptions.

Transportation networks, which are vital for moving goods and people, would have suffered severe interruptions, exacerbating inflation and limiting access to essential commodities.

The ripple effects would extend to increased unemployment and heightened social unrest, deepening poverty levels and eroding public trust in governance.

The urgency with which the DPP has acted highlights its commitment to averting these potential disasters and cushioning ordinary Malawians from further hardship.

It is important to acknowledge the resilience and determination demonstrated by the DPP in the face of a crisis not of its making.

While the MCP government’s negligence and corruption created the fuel scarcity, the DPP has taken up the mantle of responsibility with vigor and transparency.

The administration’s efforts to rebuild trust through accountability and reform are critical not only for resolving the current shortage but also for restoring hope in Malawi’s institutional capacity to manage public resources effectively.

Yet, the path ahead remains challenging. Rebuilding fuel reserves and ensuring uninterrupted supply require sustained political will, financial investment, and continuous vigilance.

The lessons from the MCP era must serve as a cautionary tale, underscoring the dangers of complacency and corruption in managing strategic national resources.

The DPP’s ongoing reforms must be supported by all stakeholders, including civil society and international partners, to foster an environment where transparency and good governance become the norm rather than the exception.

The fuel crisis in Malawi is a stark reminder of how poor leadership and corruption can jeopardize national security and economic stability.

The MCP government’s failure to maintain adequate fuel reserves and its entanglement in corrupt practices have left the country vulnerable to avoidable hardship.

Conversely, the DPP’s prompt and transparent response to the crisis signals a renewed commitment to good governance and public accountability.

By confronting the challenges head-on and instituting reforms, the DPP is not only working to stabilize the current situation but also striving to ensure that Malawi’s energy sector can support sustainable development and prosperity for all its citizens in the years to come.

Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Steve Liwewe Banda: An iconic voice that continues to electrify Malawian football commentary

Posted on by admin

Airtel Malawi

From MBC to Zodiak Radio, Malawi’s legendary commentator proves that true passion never retires, bringing the beautiful game alive for every listener.

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Steve Liwewe Banda, a veteran Malawian football commentator, retired from Malawi Broadcasting Corporation (MBC) two years ago after an incredible 38-year career.

Capital One

Although he left the state media house, he remains far from tired; in fact, his commentary now feels richer, like a vintage wine that has only improved with time.

Nowadays, Liwewe is a familiar voice on Zodiak Broadcasting Station, where he continues to narrate football matches with unmatched energy, precision, and passion.

On Sunday, 9 November 2025, the self-proclaimed Captain of the Air was back on ZBS airwaves, covering the 2025 FDH Bank Cup final between Silver Strikers FC and Mighty Wanderers FC at Bingu National Stadium.

As expected, his commentary was flawless, keeping fans glued to their radios and creating a stadium atmosphere for listeners far from the pitch.

Liwewe’s voice has become synonymous with Malawian football, bridging generations and connecting communities through the drama, skill, and excitement of the game.

For many, listening to him evokes memories of football’s golden era, when radio commentary could rival the thrill of watching a match live.

Fans often recall the days when he partnered with Patrick Simango, forming a legendary commentary duo that defined radio football coverage in Malawi.

“Chikadzati Monireeee Monireee kwatentha kuno kuli dzuwa loumitsa zithapwi eeee,” fans nostalgically quote, remembering the playful, rhythmic phrases that made every match unforgettable.

During Embassy Trophy days, teams such as MDC United, Bata Bullets, and MTL Wanderers featured legendary players, including Kachibowo Malunga, Grant Lungu, Davie Mpesi, and Ngeya Kamanga.

Bata Bullets’ roster included stars like Muzipasi Mwangonde, Jon’s Nkhwazi, Fischer Kondowe, Swadick Sanudi, Navigator, Maupo Msowoya, Clement Kafwafwa, Fundi Akidu, Daglous Chirambo, and Zakazaka.

In yesterday’s FDH Bank Cup final, Liwewe expertly narrated every moment—from Fischer Kondowe transferring the weight of attack to Muzipasi Mwangonde, to Wanderers intercepting the ball to launch a deadly counterattack.

Listeners were kept on edge as Joseph Kamwendo executed a dummy to beat a defender, only for the ball to zoom out, exemplifying the unpredictability and drama of football.

Twenty-seven minutes into the first half, Liwewe updated fans: no goals had been scored yet, highlighting Bullets’ dominance and setting the scene for an intense contest.

He captured the agony of missed opportunities, reminding fans that the most painful goals often happen in the dying minutes of a match.

“Hide your daughters because the captain is in town,” he exclaimed, blending humor with passion, a trademark of his storytelling style.

As the ball went off the field, Liwewe’s voice made even mundane moments tantalizing—dolo Steve Liwewe—showcasing his ability to bring drama to every play.

When Peter Mponda of Bullets controlled the ball, dribbled past an opponent, and launched a long ball toward Russell Mwafulirwa, Liwewe shouted with excitement: “It’s a goooooal! Malawi 1-0 Kenya! Ndidolo kasanu uyu!”

The excitement continued as Fischer Kondowe scored a second goal with a tapping header, increasing the lead to 2-1, and Liwewe’s narration captured the exhilaration perfectly.

Heartbreak followed when Mozambique’s Tico-Tico scored in the dying minutes, and Liwewe did not shy away from the drama: “Ooooooh, and they have scored! We are out! We are definitely out!”

Even missed opportunities were narrated with intensity: “Failing to score while scoring was easier than missing. Even my wife could have scored that. The empty net was yawning, but look at that bad execution by Willy Thawale!”

His famous phrase, “The ball tantalizing to the touchline!” captivated listeners, turning every action on the field into a spectacle.

Liwewe painted vivid pictures of the game: the ball zooming out for a throw-in, the suspense of an attack, or the drama of a long-range strike.

Fans have often compared his style to international commentators like Peter Drury, who similarly bring stadiums to life through voice alone.

Through his mastery, Liwewe transformed football commentary from reporting into an art form, merging tempo, hype, emotion, and imagery into a seamless narrative.

Alongside Patrick Simango, Liwewe defined the golden age of Malawian radio commentary, making listening often more thrilling than watching the match on TV.

Every pass, dribble, and goal was brought to life, allowing listeners to feel as if they were present in the stadium itself.

Even young fans born in the 2000s are learning football through his commentary, understanding player movements and tactics in a way that few could teach.

“The ball has landed in no man’s land,” he would say, turning quiet moments into suspenseful ones, keeping listeners fully engaged.

Fans who had followed him on MBC quickly discovered his new home at Zodiak Radio and continue to tune in for every match he covers.

Liwewe’s influence stretches beyond the commentary booth; he is a cultural icon whose voice shapes how Malawians experience football.

Historic matches, like the 1996 Bata Bullets vs. MTL Wanderers 5-0 victory at Civo Stadium, live on in memory largely because of his narration.

Even casual fans acknowledge that football commentary in Malawi is incomplete without mentioning Steve Liwewe Banda.

He inspires new generations of broadcasters and fans, keeping the passion for football alive across radio waves.

Every match he covers proves that retirement has not diminished his skill, enthusiasm, or influence.

Steve Liwewe Banda remains the voice of Malawian football—retired but far from tired, an enduring legend whose commentary continues to captivate hearts and minds.

Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

MCP’s hypocrisy unveiled: Chithyola’s selective outrage

Posted on by admin

Airtel Malawi

The Leader of Opposition, Simplex Chithyola, has once again demonstrated his party’s penchant for hypocrisy and double standards.

His recent outcry over alleged police brutality and human rights abuses is not only unfounded but also laughable, considering the Malawi Congress Party (MCP’s) track record of tolerating and perpetuating violence and impunity.

Capital One

Let’s set the record straight. When MCP thugs invaded Parliament and smashed a vehicle belonging to Hon. Grace Mkwezalepeta, did the MCP take any action?

Did they condemn the violence or offer to repair the damaged vehicle? No, they did not.

Instead, they chose to remain silent, and Chithyola now has the audacity to complain about the current government’s response to similar incidents.

The MCP’s selective outrage is not limited to this incident.

When human rights activist Sylvester Namiwa was assaulted in full view of the police for exercising his right to demonstration, did the MCP condemn the act or demand justice? No, they did not.

When the Dowa women were assaulted by MCP thugs, did the party take any action? No, they remained silent.

The MCP’s human rights record is a sham. They only speak out when it suits their political agenda.

Chithyola’s concerns about the silence of the churches and development partners are equally hypocritical.

Did the MCP criticize the church’s silence when their thugs terrorized Lilongwe and damaged an MP’s vehicle? No, they did not.

It’s amusing that Chithyola cites examples of alleged police brutality under the current government while ignoring the atrocities committed by his own party.

The unresolved cases of Robert Chasowa, Issa Njaunju, and the Tambala family are a testament to the MCP’s incompetence and lack of commitment to justice.

Moreover, Chithyola’s call for the government to investigate and prosecute those behind these incidents is rich, coming from a party that had ample opportunity to do so when they were in power.

The MCP’s failure to prosecute those responsible for violence and human rights abuses during their tenure is a stark reminder of their hypocrisy.

The people of Malawi remember the MCP’s reign of terror, and they will not be fooled by Chithyola’s selective outrage.

The current government may not be perfect, but it is working to address the country’s challenges and uphold the rule of law.

The MCP’s hypocrisy will not go unnoticed, and their attempts to tarnish the government’s reputation will fail.

Chithyola and the MCP need to take a long, hard look at their own house before criticizing others.

They should apologize to the people of Malawi for the violence and human rights abuses they committed during their tenure and work towards genuine reforms rather than pursuing a hypocritical agenda.

Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Bullets’ tale of two defeats: Is it time for Peter Mponda to resign or get fired?

Posted on by admin

Airtel Malawi

In the world of sports, particularly football, winning is not just the goal—it’s the standard by which coaches, players, and teams are judged. For Nyasa Big Bullets, one of Malawi’s most illustrious football clubs, recent back-to-back defeats at the hands of their arch-rivals, Mighty Wanderers, have sparked an intense debate about accountability and future direction.

As the dust settles on these disappointing performances, there is a growing conversation among fans, pundits, and stakeholders about who should bear the brunt of the blame.

Capital One

Is it time for Peter Mponda, the head coach, to take his leave, or do the players share equal responsibility for these disheartening outcomes?

Nyasa Big Bullets’ recent woes began with a stinging 3-0 defeat in a TNM Super League match at Kamuzu Stadium. Salt was rubbed into the wound when, just days later, they succumbed to a 1-0 loss in an FDH Cup encounter at the same venue, against the very same opposition.

These consecutive losses against their fiercest rivals have put the spotlight squarely on the team’s leadership and performance on the pitch. With the same squad, same coach, and same ground, fans are left questioning why the outcomes were the same — and in search of change.

The role of the head coach in any football team is pivotal. Peter Mponda, as the leader of the technical team, is tasked with not only developing strategies and tactics but also instilling a winning mentality in his players.

Football coaches are often critiqued more harshly than their players because their tactical acumen, adaptability, and man-management skills are vital to securing victories.

In the context of Nyasa Big Bullets’ recent displays, critics argue that Mponda’s tactical approach has been predictable and uninspired—failing to counteract their rivals’ strategies and exploit their weaknesses.

His match-day decisions, player positions, and substitutions have come under significant scrutiny, with many pointing out that effective use of the squad could have mitigated the defeats.

That being said, football is a team sport where outcomes are seldom determined by a single individual.

The players on the pitch share in the responsibility for any performance. It’s not just about executing the coach’s vision; it’s about individual skill, decision-making, and the collective spirit of the team.

In both losses, several players failed to capitalize on goal-scoring opportunities, lacked defensive discipline, and seemed bereft of the fighting spirit that has characterized past Bullets teams.

Finger-pointing at the coach alone overlooks the underwhelming performances from the individuals on the field who are, after all, the executors of strategy.

However, this does not absolve the coach from blame. The best coaches are able to motivate even the most underperforming teams to rise to the occasion, especially in high-stakes matches against sworn rivals.

The successive defeats to Mighty Wanderers suggest a potential disconnect between Mponda’s directives and the players’ execution—a gap that, ultimately, the coach must bridge.

Moreover, it is the coach’s responsibility to foster a locker-room environment that encourages accountability, progress, and resilience—a culture that, if present, could have turned the tide in at least one of the matches.

Peter Mponda’s tenure has been a rollercoaster, filled with moments of brilliance juxtaposed with periods of mediocrity. As the losses mount, questions not only about his tactical aptitude but also his ability to inspire and invigorate the team arise.

It is said that a coach’s philosophy can only go as far as his ability to communicate it effectively to his players—a challenge Mponda seems to face in these crucial fixtures.

While some fans are calling for Mponda’s exit, it’s crucial to consider the broader context of the club’s recent challenges. High expectations weigh heavily on Nyasa Big Bullets, a team with a storied history and a fervent fanbase.

Instant success is demanded, yet football is a game that requires a fine blend of patience, skill development, and strategic consistency. Continuity in coaching can sometimes yield long-term rewards even after short-term disappointments—a factor that club management should weigh against the immediate calls for change.

On the other hand, there’s an undeniable argument for a new start.

A different perspective may indeed provide a spark that reignites the team’s ambition and effectiveness. A new coach might bring fresh ideas, renewed energy, and an invigorating shake-up to the squad dynamics.

Clubs often face a crossroads where they must decide whether persistent support for a struggling coach rewards loyalty or reinforces stagnation, and Nyasa Big Bullets are now at such a juncture.

Ultimately, the future of Nyasa Big Bullets lies at a critical intersection. The club must deliberate not just the fate of Peter Mponda but also the direction in which they wish to steer. Both the management and the players need introspection and must align on an actionable path forward.

Whether this means trusting in Mponda’s long-term vision despite these setbacks or opting for new leadership will be decisive. The club’s legacy, its fanbase, and its competitive ambitions hinge on this decision.

The recent twin defeats should serve as a catalyst for a comprehensive evaluation of Nyasa Big Bullets’ strategies, management, and objectives.

As pressure mounts, it is essential that any decision taken resonates with the club’s core values and long-term vision.

For Peter Mponda, the door that appears ajar could still be bolted shut, but the next steps could decisively determine whether it swings open wide to opportunity or becomes a polite invitation to part ways.

Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Norman Chisale: The triple star in Malawi’s political arena

Posted on by admin

Airtel Malawi

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Malawi’s political circles are abuzz with discussions surrounding Norman Chisale, the man who seems to wear not one, not two, but three powerful hats.

Recently appointed as the Deputy Minister of Homeland Security, Chisale also serves as a Member of Parliament and continues to hold his long-standing role as the senior bodyguard to former President Arthur Peter Mutharika.

Capital One

His unique combination of duties has earned him the nickname “the triple star” among political observers and the public alike.

Many Malawians are curious and even skeptical about how Chisale manages to balance these demanding responsibilities that span the security and political spheres.

During the official opening of the 52nd Session of Parliament in Lilongwe, Chisale once again caught national attention when he appeared performing dual roles standing as both a legislator and the president’s close protection officer.

His simultaneous presence in both capacities highlighted his distinctive position within Malawi’s governance landscape.

Political analysts say Chisale’s rise demonstrates both loyalty and political resilience.

Having served in the Malawi Defense Force before becoming Mutharika’s trusted aide, Chisale has built a career grounded in discipline and proximity to power.

Now, as Deputy Minister of Homeland Security, his new responsibilities include overseeing national security matters, immigration, and internal affairs roles that require both political tact and operational expertise.

However, his multiple roles have sparked debate on ethics and governance

Critics argue that holding overlapping positions could blur professional boundaries and create potential conflicts of interest, while supporters view it as a testament to Chisale’s competence and dedication to national service.

For now, Chisale remains unfazed by public scrutiny.

His message to Malawians has been consistent: commitment to duty, loyalty to leadership, and service to the nation.

Whether he can continue to excel in his three demanding roles remains to be seen but one thing is certain, Norman Chisale has firmly established himself as one of Malawi’s most intriguing political figures.

Recently, Chisale has found himself entangled in a series of legal battles with the outgoing Malawi Congress Party (MCP)–led government.

Over the past few years, he has been pushed back and forth through the country’s court system, facing multiple charges ranging from alleged abuse of office to financial misconduct.

The legal turbulence resulted in several of his personal and business accounts being frozen, a move that drew widespread attention from both his supporters and critics.

Chisale, however, has consistently maintained his innocence, describing the cases as politically motivated attempts to tarnish his image and silence him for his perceived loyalty to the former president, Arthur Peter Mutharika.

Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post