Richest 1% have Blown Through their Fair Share of Carbon Emissions for 2026 –in just 10 Days

Civil Society, Climate Change, Development & Aid, Environment, Featured, Global, Headlines, Humanitarian Emergencies, Sustainable Development Goals, TerraViva United Nations

Opinion

Credit: Oxfam

LONDON, Jan 13 2026 (IPS) – The richest 1% have exhausted their annual carbon budget – the amount of CO2 that can be emitted while staying within 1.5 degrees of warming – only ten days into the year, according to new analysis from Oxfam. The richest 0.1% already used up their carbon limit on the 3rd January.


This day – named by Oxfam as ‘Pollutocrat Day’ – highlights how the super-rich are disproportionately responsible for driving the climate crisis.

The emissions of the richest 1% generated in one year alone will cause an estimated 1.3 million heat-related deaths by the end of the century. Decades of over consumption of emissions by the world’s super rich are also causing significant economic damage to low and lower-middle income countries, which could add up to $44 trillion by 2050.

To stay within the 1.5 degrees limit, the richest 1% would have to slash their emissions by 97% by 2030. Meanwhile, those who have done the least to cause the climate crisis – including communities in poorer and climate-vulnerable countries, Indigenous groups, women and girls – will be the worst impacted.

“Time and time again, the research shows that governments have a very clear and simple route to drastically slash carbon emissions and tackle inequality: by targeting the richest polluters.

By cracking down on the gross carbon recklessness of the super-rich, global leaders have an opportunity to put the world back on track for climate targets and unlock net benefits for people and the planet,” said Oxfam’s Climate Policy Lead Nafkote Dabi.

On top of their lifestyle emissions, the super-rich are also investing in the most polluting industries. Oxfam’s research finds that each billionaire carries, on average, an investment portfolio in companies that will produce 1.9 million tonnes of CO2 a year, further locking the world into climate breakdown.

The wealthiest individuals and corporations also hold disproportionate power and influence. The number of lobbyists from fossil fuel companies attending the recent COP summit in Brazil, for example, was more than any delegation apart from the host nation, with 1600 attendees.

“The immense power and wealth of super-rich individuals and corporations have also allowed them to wield unjust influence over policymaking and water down climate negotiations.” Dabi added.

Oxfam calls on governments to slash the emissions of the super-rich and make rich polluters pay through:

Increase taxes on income and wealth of the Super-rich and proactively support and engage on the negotiations for the UN Convention of International Tax Cooperation to deliver a fairer global architecture.

Excess profit taxes on fossil fuel corporations. A Rich Polluter Profits Tax on 585 oil, gas and coal companies could raise up to US $400 billion in its first year, equivalent to the cost of climate damages in the Global South.

Ban or punitively tax carbon-intensive luxury items like super-yachts and private jets. The carbon footprint of a super-rich European, accumulated from nearly a week of using super yachts and private jets, matches the lifetime carbon footprint of someone in the world’s poorest 1 percent

Build an equal economic system that puts people and planet first by rejecting dominant neoliberal economics and moving towards an economy based on sustainability and equality. 

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the world’s highest court, has confirmed that countries have a legal obligation to reduce emissions enough to protect the universal rights to life, food, health, and a clean environment. 

IPS UN Bureau

  Source

Natural Restoration Recovers Lagoon and Environmental Justice in Brazil: VIDEO

Civil Society, Environment, Headlines, Latin America & the Caribbean, Multimedia, TerraViva United Nations, Video

Environment

NITERÓI, Brazil, Jan 9 2026 (IPS) – “We moved from a context of socio-environmental exclusion to one of environmental justice,” said Dionê Castro, coordinator of the Sustainable Oceanic Region Program which led Brazil’s largest nature-based solutions project.


Having won national and global awards, the Orla Piratininga Park (POP) built 35,000 square meters of filtering gardens and improved the water quality of the Piratininga lagoon, in the oceanic south of Niterói, a municipality in metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, across the Guanabara Bay.

The project, named after the late Brazilian environmentalist Alfredo Sirkis, began in 2020, and aims to environmentally restore an area of 680,000 square meters on the lagoon’s shores whose waters cover an area of 2.87 square kilometers.

[embedded content]

At the heart of the project are the treatment systems for the waters of the Cafubá, Arrozal, and Jacaré rivers, which flow into the lagoon. Sedimentation and pollution were deteriorating the water resource and the quality of life in the surrounding area.

A weir, which receives the river flow, a sedimentation pond, which removes solid waste, and the filtering gardens make up the chain that partially cleans the water before releasing it into the lagoon, reducing environmental impacts, in a process called phytoremediation.

The gardens are small reservoirs where aquatic plants called macrophytes are planted, which feed on the nutrients from the pollution, explained Heloisa Osanai, the biologist specialized in environmental management of the Sustainable Oceanic Region Program (PRO Sustainable).

Three polluted water treatment stations are in the neighborhoods crossed by the rivers, based on natural resources, “without the use of electrical energy, chemicals, or concrete,” explained Castro, the coordinator of PRO Sustainable.

Furthermore, some macrophytes produce abundant flowers. Only native Brazilian species are planted, with priority given to biodiversity, added Osanai.

Along with these water treatment systems, 10.8 kilometers of bike paths, 17 recreation centers, a 2,800-square-meter Eco-Cultural Center, and other environmental works with social goals were built.

The bike path, generally along a pedestrian sidewalk, caters to physical and leisure activities but is also a factor in protecting the lagoon shoreline by blocking urban occupation and real estate invasions, explain the officials.

The area where the water system was built at the mouth of the Cafubá river was highly degraded by an open-air dump and flooding. A reformed “belt channel,” in some sections also reinforced by macrophyte islands, corrected the waterlogging.

On the other side of the lagoon, 3.2 kilometers of bioswales improve the drainage of rainwater. They are trenches with pipes, stones, and other materials, plus vegetation, that accelerate drainage and prevent pollutants from reaching the lagoon.

The main result, according to Castro, reconciled the local population with the lagoon. The old houses that “turned their backs on the lagoon” are joined by new buildings facing the water, some with balconies overlooking the new landscape, said Mariah Bessa, the engineer in charge of hydraulic aspects of the project.

The local population was highly involved in the design and construction of the new environmental and social facilities that transformed the lagoon shoreline. This led to new attitudes, such as not littering on the ground or in the water and preventing others from doing so, according to Castro.

The Ecocultural Center promotes permanent environmental education, with films, children’s games, audiovisual resources, and a large space for visits and classes.

“We moved from a context of socio-environmental exclusion to one of environmental justice,” said the coordinator of PRO Sustainable.

  Source

From floodwaters to fragility

The 2025–2026 rainy season has exposed Malawi’s deep vulnerability to climate-induced disasters, with widespread floods causing destruction and a deepening food insecurity crisis.

The floods have affected all regions, with southern and lakeshore districts bearing the heaviest burden, destroying crops, livestock, homes, and critical infrastructure.

Malawi’s food system, heavily dependent on rain-fed agriculture, has been severely impacted.

Thousands of hectares of farmland were submerged, damaging maize, rice, beans, and other crops, leading to a sharp decline in household food availability.

Effects of climate change

The destruction of irrigation schemes and river diversion structures has further undermined prospects for recovery.

The floods have also claimed large numbers of livestock, stripping families of a crucial coping mechanism and reducing their ability to purchase food or recover.

Thousands of homes have been destroyed, leaving families without secure shelter and exacerbating food insecurity.

The damage to roads and bridges has isolated communities, disrupting access to markets, healthcare, and humanitarian assistance.

The cost of transporting goods has risen sharply, contributing to shortages and price spikes.

The floods have worsened public health conditions, increasing the risk of cholera, malaria, and other water- and vector-borne diseases.

Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and people with disabilities have been disproportionately affected.

The destruction of healthcare facilities and sanitation infrastructure has further compromised the ability of affected communities to access essential services.

The economic impacts of the floods are also significant.

The destruction of crops, livestock, and infrastructure has led to substantial losses, estimated to be in the millions of dollars.

The floods have also disrupted trade and commerce, with many businesses forced to close due to the damage.

The government’s response to the floods has been swift, with the declaration of a state of disaster in affected areas.

The Malawi Defence Force has been deployed to assist with evacuation efforts, and emergency supplies have been distributed to affected communities.

However, the response has been hampered by limited resources and infrastructure.

The 2025–2026 floods offer critical lessons for Malawi.

Climate shocks are no longer exceptional events, and planning must assume recurrence.

Infrastructure vulnerability amplifies disaster impacts, requiring investment in resilient infrastructure.

Early warning systems and preparedness remain insufficient.

To build a more resilient Malawi, the government must prioritize climate-resilient infrastructure, promote flood-tolerant crop varieties, and strengthen social protection systems.

Disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation must be mainstreamed into national development strategies.

This includes investing in climate-smart agriculture, improving drainage systems, and constructing flood-resistant homes and infrastructure.

The government must also strengthen its emergency response capacity, including improving early warning systems, enhancing coordination among agencies, and increasing funding for disaster response and recovery efforts.

The international community also has a critical role to play in supporting Malawi’s recovery and resilience-building efforts.

Recommendations include prioritizing climate-resilient infrastructure, promoting flood-tolerant crop varieties, strengthening social protection systems, mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation into national development strategies, improving early warning systems, and increasing funding for disaster response and recovery efforts.

Specifically, the government should:

First, invest in climate-smart agriculture practices, such as conservation agriculture and agroforestry, to improve soil health and reduce erosion.

Second, implement flood-resistant infrastructure, such as raised foundations and flood-proof buildings, in high-risk areas.

Third, strengthen social protection systems, including emergency cash transfers and livelihood support, to help households recover from disasters.

Fourth, establish a national disaster risk reduction and management policy, with clear roles and responsibilities for government agencies and stakeholders.

Fifth, develop and implement early warning systems that can provide timely and accurate information to communities at risk.

Finally, increase funding for disaster response and recovery efforts, including the establishment of a national disaster fund.

Malawi stands at a crossroads. With deliberate investment and strong political will, the country can transform this crisis into an opportunity to build a more resilient, food-secure future.

Without such action, floods will continue to wash away not only harvests and homes, but also the hopes of millions of Malawians striving for stability and dignity.

The path forward is clear. Malawi must prioritize climate resilience, invest in disaster risk reduction, and strengthen social protection systems.

The government, international partners, and civil society must work together to build a more resilient Malawi, one that is better equipped to withstand the impacts of climate change.

In conclusion, the 2025–2026 floods have exposed Malawi’s deep vulnerabilities to climate-induced disasters.

The government must take urgent action to build resilience, prioritize climate adaptation, and strengthen social protection systems.

With deliberate investment and strong political will, Malawi can transform this crisis into an opportunity for sustainable development and food security.

The future of Malawi depends on the actions taken today.

The government, international partners, and civil society must work together to build a more resilient Malawi, one that is better equipped to withstand the impacts of climate change and ensure a food-secure future for all Malawians.

Feedback: +265884433313
Email: bonnetmunthali2101@gmail.com


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

‘Zambia Has Environmental Laws and Standards on Paper – the Problem Is Their Implementation’

Active Citizens, Africa, Civil Society, Crime & Justice, Energy, Environment, Featured, Food and Agriculture, Headlines, Health, TerraViva United Nations

Dec 29 2025 (IPS) –  
CIVICUS discusses environmental accountability in Zambia with Christian-Geraud Neema, Africa editor at the China Global South Project, an independent journalism initiative that covers and follows China’s activities in global south countries.


Zambia has environmental laws and standards on paper – the problem is their implementation’

Christian-Geraud Neema

A group of 176 Zambian farmers has filed a US$80 billion lawsuit against a Chinese state-owned mining company over a major toxic spill. In February, the collapse of a dam that was supposed to control mining waste released 50 million litres of toxic wastewater into the Kafue River system, killing fish, destroying crops and contaminating water sources for thousands of people. The compensation demand highlights broader questions about mining governance, environmental oversight and corporate accountability.

What’s this lawsuit about, and why are farmers seeking US$80 billion?

The farmers are suing Sino-Metals Leach Zambia, a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned China Nonferrous Metal Mining Group, because on 18 February, the company’s tailings dam collapsed, releasing an estimated 50 million litres of acidic, toxic wastewater and up to 1.5 million tonnes of waste material into the Kafue River. This led to water pollution affecting communities in Chambishi and Kitwe, far beyond the immediate mining area.

The lawsuit reflects real harm and frustration. From the farmers’ perspective, the company is clearly responsible. Their livelihoods have been destroyed, their land contaminated and their future made uncertain. In that context, seeking accountability through the courts is a rational response.

That said, the US$80 billion figure is likely exaggerated. It shows the absence of credible damage assessments rather than a precise calculation. When no one provides clear data on losses, communities respond by anchoring their claims in worst-case scenarios.

This case also highlights a broader accountability gap. Mining companies should be held responsible, but governments must also be questioned. These projects are approved, inspected and regulated by state authorities. If a dam was unsafe, why was it authorised? Why was oversight insufficient?

It should be noted that Zambia’s legal framework allows communities to bring such cases domestically, which is a significant step forward compared to earlier cases where affected communities had to sue foreign companies in courts abroad.

What caused the toxic spill?

There is no single, uncontested explanation. There were clear structural weaknesses in the tailings dam. Reports from civil society and media suggest the dam was not built to the required standards under Zambian regulations. But the company argues the dam complied with existing standards and that it was encroachment by surrounding communities that weakened the structure over time.

These two narratives are not mutually exclusive. Even if community interactions with the site occurred, the primary responsibility still lies with the company. Mining operations take place in complex social environments, and companies are expected to anticipate these realities and design infrastructure that is robust enough to withstand them. Ultimately, this incident reflects governance and regulatory failures. It was not an isolated accident.

What were the consequences of the spill?

The impacts have been severe and multidimensional. The spill polluted large sections of the Kafue River, reportedly extending over 100 kilometres. It killed large numbers of fish, contaminated riverbeds and disrupted ecosystems. Agriculturally, farmers using river water for irrigation saw their crops destroyed or rendered unsafe. Livestock and soil quality were also affected. Acidic and toxic substances entered water sources used daily for cooking, drinking and washing, and communities were exposed to serious health risks.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is the lack of reliable and independent data. There has been no transparent and comprehensive assessment released by the government, the company or an independent body. This absence has left communities uncertain about long-term environmental damage and health effects, and fuelled emotionally charged debates instead of evidence-based responses.

Was the disaster preventable?

Absolutely. At a technical level, stronger infrastructure, better-quality materials and stricter adherence to safety standards could have significantly reduced the risk. At an operational level, companies know mining sites are rarely isolated, and community proximity, informal access and social dynamics must be factored in when designing and securing tailings dams.

But prevention also depends heavily on governance. Mining companies are profit-driven entities, and in weak governance environments, the temptation to cut costs is high. This is not unique to Chinese firms. The main difference in how companies operate is not their origin but their context: the same companies often operate very differently in countries with weak or strong regulatory oversight. Where rules are enforced, behaviour improves; where oversight is weak, shortcuts become the norm.

The key issue here is enforcement. Zambia has good environmental laws and standards on paper. The problem is their implementation.

Could this case set a precedent?

This case has the potential to strengthen existing accountability mechanisms rather than create a new precedent. Zambia has seen similar cases before, including lawsuits involving western mining companies. What is different now is the increased legal space for communities to act locally.

If successful, the case could reinforce civil society advocacy for responsible mining, greater transparency and stronger enforcement of environmental regulations. It could also raise awareness among communities living near mining sites about their rights and the risks they face.

GET IN TOUCH
Website
Facebook
TikTok
Twitter
YouTube
Christian-Geraud Neema/LinkedIn

SEE ALSO
South Africa: ‘Environmental rights are enforceable and communities have the right to be consulted and taken seriously’ CIVICUS Lens | Interview with The Green Connection 12.Dec.2025
DRC: ‘International demand for coltan is linked to violence in the DRC’ CIVICUS Lens | Interview with Claude Iguma 09.Jul.2025
Ghana: ‘We demand an immediate ban on illegal mining and strict enforcement of environmental laws’ CIVICUS Lens | Interview with Jeremiah Sam 29.Oct.2024

  Source

A Grim Year for Democracy and Civic Freedoms – but in Gen Z There Is Hope

Active Citizens, Armed Conflicts, Civil Society, Climate Change, Crime & Justice, Democracy, Economy & Trade, Environment, Featured, Gender, Global, Headlines, Human Rights, Inequality, LGBTQ, TerraViva United Nations

Opinion

People take part in an anti-corruption protest in Kathmandu, Nepal on 8 September 2025. Credit: Navesh Chitrakar/Reuters via Gallo Images

NEW YORK, Dec 24 2025 (IPS) – 2025 has been a terrible year for democracy. Just over 7 per cent of the world’s population now live in places where the rights to organise, protest and speak out are generally respected, according to the CIVICUS Monitor, a civil society research partnership that measures civic freedoms around the world. This is a sharp drop from over 14 per cent this time last year.


Civic freedoms underpin healthy democracies, and the consequences of this stifling of civil society are apparent. At the end of the first quarter of the 21st century, the world is experiencing 19th century levels of economic inequality. The wealth of the richest 1 per cent is surging while some 8 per cent of the world’s population – over 670 million people – suffer from chronic hunger. Weapons-producing firms, closely intertwined with political elites, are reaping windfall profits as death and destruction rains down in Gaza, Myanmar, Sudan, Ukraine and many other places. It should surprise no one that the political leaders fomenting these conflicts are also squashing civic freedoms to avert questions about their motivations.

From Lima to Los Angeles, Belgrade to Dar es Salaam and Jenin to Jakarta, far too many people are being denied the agency to shape the decisions that impact their lives. Yet these places have also been the site of significant protests against governments this year. Even as authoritarianism appears to be on the march, people are continuing to pour onto the streets to insist on their freedoms. As we speak people in Sofia in Bulgaria are demonstrating in large numbers against endemic corruption which recently forced the government to resign.

History shows that mass demonstrations can lead to major advances. In the 20th century, people’s mobilisations helped achieve women’s right to vote, liberation of colonised peoples and adoption of civil rights legislation to address race-based discrimination. In the 21st century, advances have been made in marriage equality and other LGBTQI+ rights, and in highlighting the climate crisis and economic inequality through protests. But in 2025, the right to protest, precisely because it can be effective, is under assault by authoritarian leaders. Around the world, the detention of protesters is the number one recorded violation of civic freedoms, closely followed by arbitrary detentions of journalists and human rights defenders who expose corruption and rights violations.

This backsliding is now happening in major established democracies. This year, the CIVICUS Monitor downgraded Argentina, France, Germany, Italy and the USA to an ‘obstructed’ civic space rating, meaning the authorities impose significant constraints on the full enjoyment of fundamental rights. This regression is being driven by anti-rights nationalist and populist forces determined to degrade constitutional checks and balances and advance ballot box majoritarianism that denies minorities a fair say in economic, political and social life.

The push to degrade democracy by anti-rights forces now coming to fruition has been many years in the making. It accelerated this year with the return of Donald Trump. His administration immediately withdrew support to international democracy support programmes and instead built links to politicians responsible for crushing civic freedoms and committing grotesque human rights violations. Trump has laid out of the red carpet to El-Salvador’s Nayib Bukele, Hungary’s Victor Orbán, Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Salman, ushering in a new era of values-free might-is-right diplomacy that threatens to undermine decades of painstaking progress achieved by civil society.

The fallout is clear. Many wealthy democratic governments that traditionally fund civil society activities have significantly reduced their contributions. At the same time, they have linked their remaining support for civil society to narrowly defined strategic military and economic interests. In doing so, they have played directly into the hands of powerful authoritarian states such as China, Egypt, Iran, Nicaragua and Venezuela that seek to discredit domestic calls for accountability. Countries including Ecuador and Zimbabwe have introduced laws to limit the ability of civil society organisations to receive international funding.

All these developments are negatively impacting on civil society efforts for equality, peace and social justice. Yet the story of 2025 is also one of persistent resistance, and some successes. The courage demonstrated by Generation Z protesters has inspired people around the world. In Nepal, protests triggered by a social media ban led to the fall of the government, offering hope for a much-needed political reset. In Kenya, young protesters continued to take to the streets to demand political reform despite state violence. In Moldova, a cash-rich disinformation campaign run by a fugitive oligarch failed to sway the course of the national election away from human rights values. In the USA, the number of people joining the No-Kings protests just keeps on growing.

With over 90 per cent of the world’s population living with the institutional denial of full civic freedoms, anti-rights forces must be feeling pretty smug right now. But democratic dissent is brewing, particularly among Generation Z, denied political and economic opportunities but understanding that another world – one more equal, just, peaceful and environmentally sustainable – is possible. It’s far from game over yet, and even in difficult times, people will demand freedoms – and breakthroughs may be just around the corner.

Mandeep S Tiwana is Secretary General of CIVICUS, the global civil society alliance.

  Source

SKC Foundation champions landloss restoration, plants 800 trees

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The Board Chairperson of the Saulos Klaus Chilima (SKC) Foundation, Mary Chilima has called on different stakeholders to embrace the 2025-2026 tree planting season to combat climate change.

Chilima made the appeal on Saturday, December 20, 2025 when the SKC Foundation in conjunction with C’ Steinweg Bridge Group, planted 800 tree seedlings at Nanjati Primary School in Lilongwe.

Chilima said planting trees is a simple yet effective solution to address change impacts such as floods among others.

“We are all feeling the effects of climate change and planting trees is the easy solution that we all can take part in.

“People die when floods or storms hit, so by planting trees we can make sure that these challenges are addressed”, said Chilima.

She also revealed that the Foundation has adopted Nanjati Primary School as a model school for environmental conservation, as they plan to reach different areas across the country to plant trees.

“We plan to go across the country mainly in rural areas where deforestation is a real concern to make sure that we plant as many trees as we can”, said Chilima.

On his part, Environmental Health and Safety Specialist at C’ Steinweg Bridge Group, Wamaka Neba said they thought of partnering with SKC Foundation through their Environmental, Social-Governance program which aims at afforestation.

“We work with different partners in order to reach our target of planting 100,000 trees by the end of 2025 hence assisting the government to successfully achieve the Malawi 2063 development agenda, focusing on environmental sustainability enabler”, said Neba

Esther Banda, a teacher at Nanjati Primary School thanked the SKC Foundation for taking the tree planting activity to the school and has pledged to care for the planted trees and ensure that they all survive through the school’s Wildlife club.

The Ministry of Natural Resources Mining and Energy, through the Department of Forestry launched the 2025-2026 national forestry season on 15 December 2025, and almost 41,000,000 trees have been targeted to be planted during the season nationwide.

This year’s tree planting season is themed ‘Trees and Forests for Community Resilience’ and is expected to end on 15 April, 2026.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post