The hard truth behind MRA’s unjust cancellation of security service tenders

The Malawi Revenue Authority’s (MRA) recent decision to cancel the tender award intended for Masters Security Services, Iringa Security Services, and Kamu Guard Services raises serious concerns about fairness, transparency, and the integrity of procurement processes in Malawi.

The hard truth is that this cancellation is not justifiable and appears to be a reaction driven by political pressure rather than a sound business or ethical rationale.

The hard truth is that these companies have demonstrated operational excellence and delivered high standards of security services long before this tender. Masters Security Services, owned by Alfred Gangata, has a proven track record that commands respect.

To suggest that there is any conflict of interest simply because Mr. Gangata is associated with the government is to undermine the very principles of business and governance.

The question must be asked: Does holding a political office or affiliation automatically disqualify one from running a legitimate and successful business?

The hard truth is that conflating political involvement with corruption or malpractice in business is a dangerous precedent that threatens entrepreneurship and economic growth.

The hard truth is that these firms have been repeatedly successful in winning tenders from MRA and other government agencies in the past, reflecting the quality and reliability of their services. So, what has suddenly changed to warrant the cancellation of this tender? The absence of an official explanation from MRA only fuels speculation and mistrust among the public and stakeholders.

The hard truth is that transparency is paramount in public procurement, and withholding reasons for such a significant reversal undermines public confidence in the institution.

The hard truth is that the backlash from political factions such as the MCP’s wing, the Human Rights Defenders Coalition (HRDC), and others should not dictate the course of business decisions.

If MRA’s leadership bowed to such pressure, it raises questions about the independence and resilience of public institutions in the face of political interference. Should public entities be swayed by political clout rather than objective evaluation criteria? The answer is an emphatic no.

The hard truth is that the cancellation, coming after an initial notice of intention to award the contracts, disrupts the operations of these companies and places their employees and clients in uncertain positions. Security services are essential for the protection of assets and people, and any disruption can have ripple effects on safety and trust.

The hard truth is that such abrupt reversals without clear justification reflect poor governance and disrespect for contractual processes.

Furthermore, the hard truth is that the MRA Commissioner General Felix Tambulasi’s letter to Masters Security Services, while formally communicating the cancellation, conspicuously lacks any explanation.

This omission is critical. How can stakeholders assess the legitimacy of this decision without understanding the reasons? Is this a fair practice? Is this in line with procurement laws and principles of natural justice? These questions demand answers.

The hard truth is that allegations of conflict of interest should be handled transparently and with due process.

If there were genuine concerns, MRA should have conducted a thorough investigation and communicated findings openly rather than cancelling the tender abruptly. This would preserve public trust and uphold the rule of law.

The hard truth is that politics should not be a barrier to business success. Malawi, like many nations, benefits when capable individuals contribute to both governance and economic development.

The notion that one cannot hold political influence and run a legitimate business simultaneously is not only unfair but also counterproductive.

The hard truth is that this incident sends a chilling message to other business owners who may have political affiliations or backgrounds.

It risks discouraging investments and entrepreneurship, which are crucial for Malawi’s growth and development. Should Malawi’s business environment be hostage to political rivalries and vendettas? The answer must be a resolute no.

The hard truth is that the cancellation of the tender by MRA, without transparent justification and seemingly influenced by political pressure, undermines the principles of fairness, transparency, and good governance. It is an injustice to Masters Security Services, Iringa Security Services, and Kamu Guard Services, who have proven their capability and reliability over time.

Malawi’s institutions must uphold integrity and resist undue political influence to foster a healthy business environment and safeguard public trust.

So, the critical questions remain: Why was the tender cancelled without explanation? Was political interference more important than merit and service quality? How can Malawi build a fair and transparent procurement system if decisions are reversed without accountability? These are questions every Malawian should ponder as we strive for a just and equitable society.

Feedback:+265992082424

Email: jonesgadama@gmail.com


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

When has MRA become a social media’s buzz listening tax agency to cancel legal binding tender out of someone’s anger, jealousy, malice?

By Deus Chikalaza

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The Malawi Revenue Authority’s (MRA) decision to cancel a tender without providing reasons has sparked a heated debate about fairness, transparency, and the influence of politics in government procurement processes.

The move has raised concerns about whether the cancellation was motivated by a desire to exclude a particular bidder, specifically one linked to a government minister.

Why punishing a company for winning a contract simply because the owner is a minister is a clear case of unfair treatment.

If the company met the tender requirements, it should have been awarded the contract regardless of the minister’s position.

Out of three companies that were intended to be awarded security services contracts only one firm’s cancellation letter has been leaked to the public.

Why this unfairness of targeting an individual over someone bitterness, anger, malice, jealousy?

This approach undermines the principles of meritocracy and creates an uneven playing field for bidders.

MRA action also raises questions about the competence and integrity of the evaluation process.

The decision to cancel the tender due to social media buzz is also troubling.

It clearly suggests that taxing agency is more concerned with managing public perception than ensuring a fair and transparent process.

Surprisingly, the leaked tender cancellation letter was issued barely days after public notice of intending to offer the contracts following social media buzz and trial.

Surprisingly also MRA has acted swiftly without engaging the wining bidders.

The decision is made within days of public hearing without waiting final decision from tender evaluation Committee.

Whose interest is MRA serving?

This unrealistic approach can create uncertainty and undermine trust in the procurement process.

Re-advertising the tender may not necessarily address the underlying issues.

Without clear guidelines and transparency, the process may be vulnerable to similar criticisms.

To ensure fairness, the MRA should establish clear criteria for the tender process and communicate these to all stakeholders.

The re-advertisement should also include measures to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that all bidders are evaluated solely on their merits.

One potential solution is to establish an independent evaluation committee to assess bids and make recommendations, reducing the influence of individual decision-makers.

Additionally, introducing stricter conflict-of-interest guidelines and disclosure requirements for bidders with government connections can help prevent undue influence.

The MRA’s decision to cancel the tender without explanation has highlighted concerns about transparency and fairness in government procurement processes.

Addressing these concerns is crucial to maintaining public trust and ensuring that government contracts are awarded based on merit rather than political influence.

Moving forward, the MRA should prioritize transparency and fairness in the re-advertised tender process.

This includes providing clear guidelines, ensuring independent evaluation, and communicating openly with stakeholders.

By doing so, the MRA can rebuild trust and demonstrate its commitment to merit-based procurement practices.

In conclusion, MRA must follow all due process not paying attention to social media buzz otherwise the tax agency will lose public trust and credibility.

MRA should not operate under political, personal vendetta influences with calculated move to frustrate capable firms to offer quality public services.

MRA must stand by legal process without being intimidated by some noisy Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social media commentators who have political and personal interests.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

“No comment”-Gangata on MRA security services tender cancellation

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-State Minister and Masters Group Executive Director Alfred Gangata says “No comment” on the decision Malawi Revenue Authority (MRA) cancelling the security services the authority wanted to ward to three companies.

MRA wanted award security services to three companies including Masters Security, Iringa Security, and Kamu Guard services.

But in a public notice dated December 31, 2025, MRA has cancelled a tender awarded to all three companies without giving any reasons.

The authority is expected to re-advertise the tender to the public.

MRA publicist Wilma Chalulu has confirmed writing letter to the three companies.

When contacted Masters Group Chief Gangata on matter, he just said, “NO comment”!

The procurement reference number for the cancelled tender is MRA/Security Services/12/11/2025.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

How Malawi’s Digital Tax Stamp agenda could reshape public finance

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Malawi is preparing for a major change in the way taxes are recorded and collected as the Malawi Revenue Authority (MRA) moves forward with the roll-out of the Electronic Invoicing System (EIS) in February 2026.

The rollout was initially scheduled for November 2025 but was postponed after taxpayers and key stakeholders requested more time to understand the system’s technical and operational requirements.

The MRA, which has long relied on Electronic Fiscal Devices (EFDs), describes the EIS as a major digital upgrade that is more efficient, user friendly, and cost effective.

According to MRA, the shift to the EIS is part of a broader effort to improve tax compliance and record keeping.

The system promises better accessibility and functionality for businesses of all sizes, aligning Malawi with a growing list of countries pursuing similar digital tax reforms.

For example, Uganda introduced its Electronic Fiscal Receipting and Invoicing System (EFRIS) earlier this year, while Poland’s KSeF and Saudi Arabia’s FATOORAH are also underway.

Tanzania’s Electronic Financial Data Management System (EFDMS), Vietnam’s e-invoicing platform, and Mauritius’ EBS reflect the same continental and global trend.

Across these nations, governments have recognised the severe losses caused by tax non-compliance in revenue collection.

In Malawi, the issue is especially pressing as we face a fiscal deficit of MK2.4 trillion, twice the budget for education (MK1.3 trillion) and nearly four times the allocation for health (MK714 billion).

The World Bank estimates that tax evasion alone costs Malawi about 12 percent of its GDP, a figure higher than Namibia’s by roughly three percentage points.

Combined with persistent corruption, these losses have significantly constrained public investment and service delivery.

Despite previous reform efforts, Malawi’s fiscal challenges have persisted for decades. But digital interventions like the EIS and the recently introduced Digital Excise Tax Stamps (Kalondola) offer a potential turning point for revenue management and transparency.

In 2024, the MRA signed a ten-year agreement with SICPA Malawi, a subsidiary of the Swiss-based SICPA SA, globally known for secure traceability and authentication technology.

The partnership introduced the Kalondola system to modernise excise tax collection and reinforce accountability in Malawi.

The SICPA technology behind Kalondola uses secure tax stamps combining material and digital security features.

It allows both authorities and consumers to verify product authenticity while helping detect illicit trade activities such as counterfeiting or smuggling.

The system improves oversight across the supply chain, particularly for excisable goods such as cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, bottled water, carbonated soft drinks, lotions & glycerines.

These categories have historically been vulnerable to under-declaration and illicit trade.

Castel Malawi, one of the country’s largest beverage producers, publicly supported the initiative, saying the digital excise tax stamps enable accurate revenue capture that can be reinvested in essential services and economic growth.

In a press statement, Castel Malawi Managing Director Thomas Reynaud emphasized the importance of consumer vigilance in the fight against counterfeit products, which he said pose serious health risks and undermine legal trade.

“Castel Malawi Limited urges all customers to remain alert and ensure that all spirits purchased are genuine and compliant with legal standards,” said Reynaud. “Authentic Castel products carry digital tax stamps, date stamps, and batch numbers, which are clear indicators of their legitimacy and regulatory compliance.”

In supporting digital tax reforms, economic and policy expert Dumbani Mzale notes the substantial economic and governance benefits that digital tax stamps can bring to public finance management, including increased revenue collection and the reduction of illicit trade.

Mzale said, “Digital tax stamps (Kalondola), particularly for excisable goods like alcohol and tobacco, help governments all over the world to effectively control and collect taxes.

By minimizing opportunities for fraud and tax evasion, the state can significantly boost its revenue streams, and Malawi could be no exception if this agenda could be implemented to the letter.”

He added, “For too long, Malawi has been a victim of counterfeit products, especially beer and other key consumables.

This has resulted in the country losing billions of Kwachas in potential tax revenue, money that could have helped reduce the gap between total government expenditure and total domestic revenue, which includes tax and non-tax revenue.”

By deploying both the EIS and Kalondola, the Government of Malawi is signalling a shift toward stronger controls, cleaner tax administration, and better protection of public resources and of consumers.

Moreover, this state-of-the art technology enables leveling the playing field for legitimate actors whose contribution to growth and development of the country is paramount, contrary to illicit traders.

If implemented effectively, these reforms could help move the country toward a more stable, predictable, and equitable public finance framework.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post