As Biodiversity Loss Grows, Rome Talks Urge Nations to Step Up Action

Biodiversity, Climate Change, Conferences, Editors’ Choice, Environment, Europe, Featured, Global, Green Economy, Headlines, Natural Resources, Sustainable Development Goals, TerraViva United Nations

Biodiversity

A red panda – labelled ‘endangered’ by the IUCN – at an animal sanctuary in the Indian state of West Bengal. As biodiversity loss accelerates, UNCBD is asking countries to take greater action to protect it. Credit: Stella Paul/IPS

A red panda – labelled ‘endangered’ by the IUCN – at an animal sanctuary in the Indian state of West Bengal. As biodiversity loss accelerates, UNCBD is asking countries to take greater action to protect it. Credit: Stella Paul/IPS

ROME & NEW DELHI, Feb 23 2026 (IPS) – Governments meeting in Rome last week acknowledged that global efforts to protect nature are still not moving fast enough, even as biodiversity loss continues to affect ecosystems, livelihoods, and economies worldwide.


The warning came as the sixth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI-6) under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) concluded after four days of negotiations focused on how countries are putting global biodiversity commitments into practice.

Held at the headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the meeting is the first major checkpoint in a year of intensive talks leading to the United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP17) in October in Yerevan, Armenia. There, governments will carry out the first global review of progress under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

From Promises to Practice

At the centre of discussions in Rome was the challenge of turning global promises into action on the ground. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF), adopted in 2022, sets out 23 targets to be achieved by 2030, including protecting and restoring ecosystems, reducing pollution, cutting harmful subsidies, and ensuring fair sharing of benefits from genetic resources.

While most governments have formally endorsed the framework, SBI-6 revealed that implementation remains uneven. Negotiators worked through recommendations on biodiversity finance, national planning, gender equality, capacity-building, international cooperation, and access and benefit-sharing. Many of these were adopted without brackets, suggesting broad agreement.

“This has been a long week for all,” said Clarissa Souza Della Nina, Chair of the meeting, as she closed the afternoon plenary and announced that delegates would meet again in the evening. She noted that turning global ambitions into real action on the ground requires strong systems and institutions, and that this is not an easy process.

“The conclusion of SBI-6 marks an important early milestone in a very demanding year,” said Souza Della Nina, highlighting the efforts made by countries to work together and find common ground.

But behind the consensus language, discussions repeatedly returned to the same concern: global ambition is not yet being matched by national action.

SBI 6 Chair Clarissa Souza Della Nina, Brazil; Asad Naqvi, SBI 6 Secretary; and CBD Executive Secretary Astrid Schomaker celebrating the first conference room paper being approved. Credit: IISD/ENB, Mike Muzurakis

SBI 6 Chair Clarissa Souza Della Nina, Brazil; Asad Naqvi, SBI 6 Secretary; and CBD Executive Secretary Astrid Schomaker celebrate the first conference room paper being approved. Credit: IISD/ENB, Mike Muzurakis

National Plans Show Mixed Progress

A key input to the Rome meeting was an analysis by the CBD Secretariat of national biodiversity strategies and targets submitted so far. These national plans are the main way countries translate the global framework into domestic policies.

The analysis covered 51 National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs) and 130 sets of national targets. It found that while progress is being made, many plans fall short of the scale of change required.

About 75 percent of Parties have submitted national targets, but fewer have updated their full national strategies. Even among submitted plans, several global targets are only partially addressed. Social and economic aspects of biodiversity loss — including links to livelihoods, equity, and development — tend to receive less attention than conservation measures.

“These findings show clearly where we stand,” said Astrid Schomaker, Executive Secretary of the CBD. “They also show that countries still have the opportunity to raise ambition and speed up action before the global review.”

The first global review of progress under the KMGBF will take place at COP17. A major source of information for that review will be the seventh National Reports, which countries are required to submit by 28 February 2026.

By the end of SBI-6, the European Union, Lesotho, Uganda, and Switzerland had submitted their reports. Several other countries said they were close to completion, while others cited difficulties related to limited staff, technical challenges, or delays in accessing funds.

Delegates stressed that timely reporting is essential, not only for transparency but also to ensure that the global review reflects the realities faced by countries at different levels of development.

Gender and Inclusion Lag Behind

Another issue that drew attention in Rome was the limited integration of gender equality into biodiversity action. Under the global framework, countries have committed to ensuring the full and meaningful participation of women and girls, including those from indigenous peoples and local communities.

Yet the Secretariat’s analysis showed that only around 40 percent of national targets refer to gender-related issues, and only about 20 percent address women’s rights to land and natural resources. Even fewer countries reported involving women’s organisations in the preparation of national biodiversity plans.

For many participants, this gap was a reminder that biodiversity loss is not only an environmental issue but also a social one.

“Without addressing inequality, we will not succeed in protecting nature,” said Gillian Guthrie, a delegate from Jamaica, during the discussions, urging governments still updating their plans to take a more inclusive approach.

Money and Capacity Remain Major Hurdles

Financing biodiversity action was another recurring theme. Although the most detailed negotiations on biodiversity finance are scheduled for later this year, talks in Rome were informed by new studies on funding needs, the relationship between debt and biodiversity spending, and opportunities to better align biodiversity and climate finance.

Developing countries repeatedly pointed to limited financial resources, lack of access to technology, and institutional constraints as barriers to implementation. These challenges were reflected in the meeting itself, where several delegations consisted of a single representative struggling to follow multiple negotiating tracks.

The CBD Secretariat thanked donor countries that contributed to a special trust fund to support participation and called on others to do the same. Without broader support, delegates warned, global biodiversity decision-making risks leaving some voices unheard.

A decisive year ahead

The recommendations adopted at SBI-6 will now be forwarded to COP17, where governments will assess whether collective action so far is enough to meet the biodiversity targets set for 2030.

For many participants, the Rome meeting served as both a progress report and a warning. While cooperation is improving and more countries are engaging with the global framework, biodiversity loss continues to affect food systems, health, and economic stability, particularly in the Global South.

As delegates left Rome, the message was clear: the coming months will be critical. Whether the world can move from commitments to meaningful action will be tested in Yerevan, Armenia — and the stakes, many warned, could not be higher.

Below are some of the highlights of the 4-day meeting:

  • The sixth meeting of the Subsidiary Body (SBI-6) on Implementation under the Convention on Biological Diversity began the first global review of how countries are acting to protect nature.
  • An official analysis of national biodiversity plans showed progress but also revealed wide gaps between global goals and what many countries have committed to do at home.
  • Around three-quarters of countries have submitted national biodiversity targets, but far fewer have updated full national strategies or addressed social and economic aspects of biodiversity loss.
  • Gender equality and the participation of women, Indigenous Peoples, and local communities remain weak in many national plans, despite being central to the global biodiversity agreement.
  • Developing countries highlighted ongoing challenges linked to limited funding, lack of technical capacity, and difficulty accessing resources needed to implement biodiversity actions.
  • The outcomes from Rome will shape how global progress on biodiversity is measured and reviewed, setting the tone for accountability and action in the run-up to 2030.

IPS UN Bureau Report

 

Ode to U.S. Civil Rights Icon Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr: A Life That Carried the Rainbow

Civil Society, Democracy, Featured, Global, Headlines, Human Rights, IPS UN: Inside the Glasshouse, TerraViva United Nations

Opinion

Ode to U.S. Civil Rights Icon Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr: A Life That Carried the Rainbow

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was saddened to learn of the passing of the Rev. Jesse Jackson, a giant of the civil rights movement in the US and a longtime champion of human rights, equality and justice around the world. Credit: United Nations

NEW YORK, Feb 20 2026 (IPS) – When the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. declared, “Keep hope alive,” it was not a slogan. It was a discipline. It was a moral posture. It was a promise to those America had locked out of its prosperity and pushed to the margins of its democracy. And for more than five decades, Jackson kept that promise – organizing, marching, preaching, negotiating, and standing in solidarity with oppressed peoples at home and abroad.


In mourning Jackson, the United States does not simply bid farewell to a towering civil rights leader. It salutes one of the architects of modern American conscience.

The Heir to a Movement, the Builder of a Coalition

Born in Greenville, South Carolina, in 1941, Jackson came of age in the crucible of segregation. As a young activist, he worked alongside the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, absorbing the lessons of nonviolent resistance while sharpening his own gifts for oratory and mobilization. After King’s assassination in 1968, Jackson did not retreat into despair. He stepped forward.

In 1971, he founded Operation PUSH (People United to Save Humanity), later merging it into the Rainbow Coalition. That phrase – Rainbow Coalition – was not rhetorical flourish. It was strategic genius. Jackson understood that America’s power structure thrived on division: Black against white, native-born against immigrant, worker against worker. His coalition sought to transcend those fault lines.

Black, brown, yellow, and poor white Americans; labor unions; family farmers; peace activists; Arab Americans; Jewish progressives; Asian Americans; Latinos; Native Americans—Jackson invited them all into a shared moral project. In the 1980s, when he ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1984 and 1988, millions who had never seen themselves reflected in presidential politics suddenly felt visible. He did not win the presidency. But he expanded the boundaries of who could plausibly seek it.

In doing so, Jackson helped pave the road that others would travel – most notably Barack Obama who went on to become the first African American President of the United States of America. Without the Rainbow Coalition, the arc of American political inclusion would have bent far more slowly.

Internationalism as Moral Imperative

Jackson’s courage was not confined to domestic battles. At a time when Cold War orthodoxy and Middle East politics discouraged nuance and punished dissent, he insisted that American moral credibility required consistency.

He extended solidarity to the oppressed people of Palestine long before it was politically fashionable – or safe – to do so. Jackson argued that the dignity and rights of Palestinians were inseparable from the universal principles Americans claimed to cherish. He sought dialogue with leaders across divides, believing that empathy was not endorsement, and that engagement was a prerequisite for peace.

He was equally forthright in condemning South Africa’s apartheid regime. While many U.S. leaders hedged or prioritized strategic interests, Jackson stood with the anti-apartheid movement. He supported sanctions and economic pressure to dismantle a system that codified racial subjugation. When Nelson Mandela emerged from 27 years of imprisonment, Jackson was among those who celebrated not only a man’s freedom but a nation’s rebirth.

In both Palestine and South Africa, Jackson’s stance reflected a deeper conviction: that civil rights were not an American export but a universal birthright. His faith demanded it. His politics operationalized it.

Faith, Integrity, and the Politics of Presence

Jackson was first and always a preacher. His sermons were political, but his politics were pastoral. He believed that despair was the greatest ally of injustice. To tell the forgotten that they mattered was itself an act of resistance.

He traveled where others would not. He negotiated for the release of hostages in Syria and Cuba. He met with heads of state and with families in housing projects. He listened.

Critics sometimes accused him of courting controversy or of grandstanding. But Jackson understood a hard truth: marginalized communities often need someone willing to occupy uncomfortable space on their behalf. Silence, in his view, was complicity.

His life was not without flaws or missteps. No life of consequence is. Yet what distinguished Jackson was his refusal to abandon the struggle. He endured political setbacks, media caricatures, and internal party resistance. He persisted.

Leadership, he demonstrated, is not about perfection. It is about fidelity—to principles, to people, to purpose.

The Rainbow as a Democratic Blueprint

In an era increasingly defined by polarization, Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition reads less like a relic of the 1980s and more like a blueprint for democratic survival. He recognized demographic change not as a threat but as a promise. He saw in America’s diversity the possibility of moral and economic renewal.

He championed voting rights, labor protections, public education, and economic justice. He opposed apartheid abroad and discrimination at home. He insisted that foreign policy reflect domestic values and that domestic policy reckon with global inequality.

The Rainbow was not naïve about power. It was strategic. It sought to translate moral energy into electoral leverage. Jackson registered voters. He built grassroots networks. He forced party platforms to incorporate issues once dismissed as fringe.

His presidential campaigns altered the calculus of American politics. They demonstrated that Black candidates could compete nationally, that poor and working-class voters could be mobilized across racial lines, and that progressive foreign policy positions had a constituency.

A Hand Extended Across Divides

Perhaps Jackson’s most underappreciated gift was his willingness to extend a hand of friendship where animosity seemed entrenched. He believed in meeting adversaries face-to-face. He believed that even hardened systems could yield to persistent moral pressure.

In Palestine, Rev. Jesse Jackson Senior spoke of human rights and mutual recognition. In South Africa, he, spoke of freedom and reconciliation. At home, he, spoke of multiracial democracy.

When few American leaders dared to articulate solidarity with Palestinians living under occupation, Jackson did. When Washington’s establishment hesitated to confront Pretoria’s apartheid regime, Jackson did not. His courage was not abstract. It was embodied in travel, in speeches, in alliances, in risks taken.

He paid political costs for these positions. But he did not recalibrate his convictions to suit prevailing winds.

The Best of the United States

To commemorate Jesse Jackson is to acknowledge the paradox of America itself. He emerged from a nation scarred by slavery and segregation, yet he believed in its redemptive capacity. He criticized its failures unsparingly, yet he invested his life in its institutions.

He was, in that sense, profoundly patriotic.

The United States at its best is not defined by military might or economic dominance. It is defined by its capacity for self-correction. By its willingness to expand the circle of belonging. By its recognition that justice delayed is democracy diminished.

Jackson embodied that tradition. He did not romanticize America. He challenged it. He called it to live up to its founding ideals – not selectively, but universally.

As debates rage today over voting rights, racial equity, immigration, Middle East policy, and America’s global role, Jackson’s life offers a moral compass. He reminds us that coalitions are built, not assumed. That solidarity is practiced, not proclaimed. That hope is sustained through organization.

Keeping Hope Alive

In the final analysis, Jesse Jackson’s greatest achievement may have been psychological. He taught millions that their voices mattered. That they were not condemned to permanent marginalization. That politics could be an instrument of empowerment rather than exclusion.

For Black Americans who had never seen a serious presidential bid from one of their own, he opened a door. For Palestinians seeking recognition of their humanity, he offered validation. For South Africans resisting apartheid, he offered solidarity. For workers, immigrants, and the poor, he offered a coalition.

He lived the conviction that the struggle for justice is indivisible.

Today, as the rainbow he envisioned faces new storms, the measure of our tribute will not be in words but in action. To honor Jesse Jackson is to organize. To vote. To speak. To stand with the oppressed – whether in Chicago, Johannesburg, or Gaza. To build alliances across lines others insist are permanent.

He demonstrated that leadership grounded in faith, integrity, and courage can alter a nation’s trajectory. He showed that America’s story is not finished – and that its best chapters are written by those who refuse to surrender to cynicism.

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. kept hope alive.

The question now is whether we will.

Purnaka L. de Silva, Ph.D., is College and University Adjunct Professor of the Year 2022, Best Adjunct Professor 2024-2025 and Nominated Best Adjunct Professor 2026 at the School of Diplomacy and International Relations Seton Hall University; Visiting Professor Sol Plaatje University Faculty of Humanities; Director Institute of Strategic Studies and Democracy (ISSD) Malta; and Strategic Advisor Lead Integrity.

IPS UN Bureau

  Source

Hyphen reignites hip-hop ‘sparring’

Feuding among hip-hop artists has for long been part of the music genre globally.

The battles, which are loosely referred to as beef, are propelled through lyrical content as artists aim digs at each other through media engagements or any other possible platforms.

Here in Malawi, the culture is also prevalent and of late, it has taken an upward turn. New names in the game such as IKK, Toast, Bssecube and C Scripture, have added a new layer to the beef culture.

It is not uncommon to see artists attack each other lyrically and it is something that has not gone unnoticed by music fans.

One music fan, Tiberro Walulu, said: “To my understanding, hip hop is not just about the music. It implies the culture of black Americans. It is not about the strength of the music content alone. They throw mud at their rivals while praising themselves. That is real hip-hop.”

Hyphen: I just had to remind
everyone . | Hyphen

On Wednesday, one of the country’s pioneering modern hip hop acts, Hyphen, who was previously known as Young Kay, elevated the beef culture to another level through his new song Tiziti Mwayiwala in which he has taken a swipe at his hip hop rivals.

The artist has come out charging, claiming that although he has been silent for long, he is still one of the top players of the game. Hyphen has also reflected on the standards the hip-hop has taken.

He says in the opening stanza: “Makape ndawawona litsilo, ngini yake itiyo mukusimbwirayo? Nyimbo zonse nthabwala ngati Winiko. Kamandinyasa ine ndikachisimo kofuna kufufuta mbiri ko. Munthu ndinali pompa when they popped up, I am the one who cut your umbilical…”

The no-holds barred approach the artist has taken in the song is in stark contrast with the serene image and status he has retained until now. But regardless of that shift, Tiziti Mwayiwala has reaffirmed his status as one of the country’s lyrists.

Speaking in an interview yesterday, Hyphen said with the ever-changing times where people often gravitate towards trending issues, he needed to make a statement that he is still a force in the industry.

“Why were people acting as if the people who were there before do not matter together with their contributions? I just had to remind everyone that I am still here,” he said.

The Anakabango creator said he has no problem with the beef culture as it is just a trait of the genre that keeps one competitive.

Hyphen’s last project came in 2024 through a single titled Experience which features Pon G. Apart from featuring in several songs, his silence on the radar has been noticeable. He has attributed it to other commitments such as personal businesses.

He said: “Music is evolving and with that there will always be some good and bad aspects. The social media era has made it easy for artist to get content to their fans. Many times people are consuming content that is not serious and other artists have chosen that path too.”

Hyphen, real name Francis Kaphuka, released his album Exhale in 2007 which was followed by First Impression in 2012. He later released a mixtape Pachidolo. To date, he is among the five artists that had the chance to perform at the MultiChoice Africa’s television reality show Big Brother show in South Africa

their talent.

He also highlighted the need for increased corporate support toward the poetry industry. He noted that while musicians often receive sponsorship, poets continue to struggle for similar support.

“Poetry is a powerful medium for information expression. If supported properly, it can drive meaningful social change,” he said, adding that he remains optimistic that partnerships with corporate institutions will grow.

The event’s spokesperson William Shumba described Seunda as a purpose-driven artist committed to contributing to Malawi’s socio-economic development through art.

“Being in the poetry industry is not only for him to showcase his talent, but also to show that Yankho Seunda is a purpose driven individual who has always looked forward to contribute toward the country’s socio-economic development,” he said.

The event, scheduled to start at 5pm, will also feature performances from other artists, including Chifundo Chikonga, with additional surprise acts expected.

The launch on is expected to attract poetry lovers, corporate representatives and members of the public eager to engage in conversations that shape Malawi’s future.

Seunda: Poetry is a powerful medium. | Nation

Source

Passport printing challenges persists as Malawi Govt clings to discredited Indian firm Madras

By Draxon Maloya

MZUZU-(MaraviPost)-Questions continue to mount following President Peter Arthur Mutharika’s declaration during his State of the Nation Address in Parliament on Friday that his government will procure heavy-duty passport printing machines to ease the burden of producing travel documents locally.

Socioeconomic advocates have expressed concern that the government persists in relying on Madras Security Printers (MSP) of India—a company widely accused of corruption and failed projects—despite the enormous strain this continues placing the Department of Immigration in issuing passports to citizens.

Commentators argue that MSP secured its contract under the previous administration through the influence of then-Acting Director General of Immigration Ananchuma Kalindangoma and Principal Secretary for Homeland Security Steven Kayuni, allegedly sidelining other qualified competitors in favour of kickbacks.

Mervin Nxumayo, chairperson of the Young Human Rights Defenders Network (YHRDN), warned that procuring more machines will not resolve the crisis:

“Madras Security Printers pocketed about IS$12.8 million upfront before processing a single passport as part of the US$27 million deal. Yet today, the government is buying printers for them. What was that US$12.8 million for if not heavy-duty printers? Malawi is obsessed with procurement,” lamented Nxumayo.

It is reported elswhere, MSP faces serious allegations of corruption and failed projects across multiple countries, including Kenya, South Sudan, Mauritius, and India.

Bangladesh even banned the company over fraudulent practices involving tax stamps and stolen data.

In early 2025, then-Leader of Opposition Hon. George Chaponda urged the Malawi Congress Party-led government to cancel MSP’s contract after a severe passport printing crisis left thousands stranded.

“Reports indicate that MSP failed to roll out passport printing months after being paid over K8.7 billion. The company was alleged to have been awarded over K100 billion in contracts through secretive, non-transparent processes,” Chaponda told Parliament, pressing for a “reputable and scandal-free company.”

An informant within the Department of Immigration revealed that Malawi already possesses heavy-duty passport printers capable of producing 150,000 passports in two days—enough to clear the backlog.

He further alleged that despite objections, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) was pressured by senior MCP and State House officials to approve a US$35 million deal with MSP for blank national ID cards.

Homeland Security Minister Peter Mukhitho recently announced that three new heavy-duty machines destined for Mzuzu, Mangochi, and Blantyre are expected to arrive next week.

“The machines are part of a contract signed in February 2025 between the Malawi Government and MSP. By the time the current administration assumed office, only US$9 million had been paid out of the required US$17.9 million. This funding gap disrupted implementation and contributed to delays,” Mukhitho explained.

Critics argue that MSP continues to print passports in India despite receiving millions for “setup costs.” Local firm Technobrain, they note, managed to establish operations in two weeks at less than US$500,000, printing over 200,000 passports in under a year despite political hostility and limited capacity. MSP, by contrast, has printed fewer than 50,000.

Social media advocate Leonard Chimbanga criticized the government’s continued dealings with MSP:

“Here in Malawi, Lazarus Chakwera and Madame Colleen Zamba are happily handing them a aUS$29.9 million passport deal. What could go wrong? Maybe next, we shall let bank robbers handle our treasury,” he wrote.

Chimbanga further alleged that continuing to work with MSP amounts to direct government funding of the former ruling Malawi Congress Party, which initially offered the contract under undisclosed terms.

In 2024, Malawi transitioned to a secure e-passport system after a major system hack and the cancellation of the previous supplier left thousands stranded.

To stabilize the situation, the government engaged local firm E-Tech Systems under temporary contracts.

The upgraded system was capable of processing over 10,000 passports daily, offering express services within 1–2 days and ordinary processing within 10 days—a significant improvement compared to delays of up to 12 months.

Despite the availability of six heavy-duty printers, political interference prevented their integration into the system.

Instead, authorities pursued new procurement deals, reportedly 40 times costlier than local solutions and payable in USD, allegedly to secure campaign kickbacks.

Progress was further marred by corruption, poor contract management, and abrupt termination of agreements without proper transition.

This locked in over 200,000 processed applications, forcing citizens to reapply. Reports also suggested that senior officials demanded bribes from E-Tech Systems, undermining efforts to clear the backlog.

In March 2024, passport fees were revised to MK100,000 for a 64-page (10-year) booklet and MK50,000 for a 32-page (5-year) booklet.

Citizens were also introduced to an online application system allowing renewals and real-time tracking—developed under the emergency solution but later publicized as MSP’s package.

Observers warn that the government is once again being misled into endless procurement.

The real problem, they argue, is not printing capacity but processing inefficiencies, politicization, poor contract management, and lack of system transitions.

The Maravi Post

England King Charles III’s brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested over office misconduct

LONDON-(MaraviPost)-Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, brother of King Charles III of England, has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

According to CNN, officers arrived at Mountbatten-Windsor’s home at Sandringham, King Charles’s estate in Norfolk, early Thursday morning.

Police said they were searching addresses in Norfolk and Berkshire, where the former prince lived until he left his home at Windsor this month.

Police had previously said the force was reviewing allegations that a woman was trafficked to the UK by Jeffrey Epstein to have a sexual encounter with Mountbatten-Windsor, and claims he shared sensitive information with the convicted sex offender while serving as the UK’s trade envoy.

Mountbatten-Windsor has denied all accusations against him and insisted that he never witnessed or suspected any of the behaviour of which Epstein was accused.

He has not commented on recent allegations of misconduct in public office.

The British loyal family is also yet to comment on the matter.

The Maravi Post

Collins Magalasi, Shonga Shonga’s corruption matter stalls a year after court found them a case to answer

Dorothy in Yellow during previous court session on corruption charges

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-About eleven months have passed since High Court Judge Patrick Chirwa, sitting as Chief Resident Magistrate ruled that former Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority (MERA) Chief Executive Officer Collins Magalasi, businesswoman Dorothy Shonga, and two other suspects have a case to answer in a high-profile corruption case.

The four were arrested in 2020 on allegations of abusing their positions to manipulate MERA’s Internal Procurement and Disposal Committee (IPDC) into awarding a lucrative MK186 million contract to Vink Enterprise, a company owned by Shonga. 

The deal, which sparked a major scandal, raised concerns about procurement irregularities within MERA.

Delivering his ruling in March 2025, Judge Chirwa stated that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence to warrant the accused defending themselves in court. The ruling effectively dismisses any possibility of an immediate acquittal and sets the stage for the defence to present its arguments.

“This court has carefully examined the evidence submitted by the State, and it is clear that the accused have questions to answer regarding their involvement in the contract awarding process,” Chirwa said.

The case revolves around allegations that Magalasi, in collaboration with Shonga and the other accused, bypassed standard procurement procedures to unlawfully benefit Vink Enterprise.

The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), which led the investigation, has argued that the deal was tailored to favour Shonga’s company at the expense of transparency and fairness.

Following the ruling, legal experts say the accused had the opportunity to challenge the evidence and present their defence.

If found guilty, they could face severe penalties, including imprisonment and financial restitution.

The case attracted significant public attention, as it underscores ongoing efforts to combat corruption in Malawi.

Civil society organizations and governance watchdogs welcomed the court’s decision, urging authorities to ensure that justice is served without bias.

But now with eleven months after the ruling was made in March 2025, the case has never seen a day in the court.

Both ACB and Judiciary public relations office are yet to give reasons why the case has stalled for a year.

Why could such a high profile case stall like that after the suspects were found a case to answer? Who is sitting on the case

The Maravi Post