…..Thousands of civilians reportedly trapped amid escalating violence in Sudan
Medical charity Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has reported that thousands of civilians are feared trapped in the Sudanese city of Al Fasher.
The city has reportedly fallen under the control of paramilitary forces, raising serious concerns about the safety of residents.
MSF warns that those trapped face imminent danger, with limited access to food, water, and medical care.
Local hospitals and aid facilities are struggling to cope as the conflict disrupts essential services and humanitarian operations.
The situation in Al Fasher is part of a wider escalation of violence in Sudan, which has displaced thousands and threatened civilian populations across multiple regions.
International humanitarian organizations have called for immediate protection measures and safe corridors to allow civilians to evacuate safely.
As the crisis unfolds, the international community is monitoring the situation closely, emphasizing the urgent need for intervention to prevent further loss of life.
Share this:
Like this:
LikeLoading…
Discover more from The Maravi Post
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The formation of the Northern Region Political Block, spearheaded by Frank Mwenifumbo, Khumbo Kachali, and Dr. Victor Madhlopa, is a stark reminder of the divisive politics that have long threatened the fabric of our nation.
This bloc, masquerading as a champion of regional interests, is nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to divide Malawi and undermine the very foundations of our national unity.
By advocating for a Northern Region Block, these politicians are, in essence, promoting regionalism over nationalism.
They are pitting one region against another, fueling the very fires of tribalism and sectarianism that have ravaged many African countries.
This is a recipe for disaster, and we must condemn it in the strongest possible terms.
The idea of a Northern Region Block may seem appealing to some, particularly those who feel marginalized or disenfranchised.
However, the reality is that such a bloc would only serve to further balkanize our country, creating divisions that would be impossible to heal.
If the Northern Region can form a bloc, why not the Central Region or the Southern Region? Where would this end? Would we soon have a plethora of regional blocs, each vying for power and resources, and each more entrenched in their regional identities?
The consequences of such a scenario would be catastrophic.
We would be creating a nation of competing regional interests, where loyalty to one’s region supersedes loyalty to the nation.
We would be sacrificing national unity on the altar of regionalism, and the results would be devastating.
Our economy would suffer, our infrastructure would crumble, and our people would be pitted against one another in a desperate scramble for resources.
Moreover, what guarantee do we have that this bloc would truly serve the interests of the Northern Region? The track record of these politicians is hardly inspiring.
They have held positions of power before, and yet the North remains one of the most underdeveloped regions in the country. What makes them think that this time would be any different?
The answer, of course, is that this bloc is not about serving the interests of the North or any other region.
It is about serving the interests of these politicians, who are more concerned with clinging to power than with serving the people.
They are using the legitimate concerns of the North as a smokescreen to further their own agendas, and we must not let them get away with it.
We must reject this divisive politics and stand up for national unity.
We must demand that our politicians prioritize the interests of Malawi over and above their regional or ethnic loyalties.
We must insist on a politics of inclusion, where every Malawian feels valued and represented, regardless of their region or background.
The Northern Region Political Block is a recipe for disaster, and we must condemn it in the strongest possible terms.
We must stand together as Malawians and reject this attempt to divide us.
We owe it to ourselves, our children, and our nation to build a brighter future, a future based on unity, stability, and harmony.
Let us stand together and say no to regionalism, no to tribalism, and no to sectarianism.
Let us stand together and demand a politics of inclusion, a politics that puts the interests of Malawi first. The time for divisive politics is over; it is time for unity, stability, and harmony.
Let us build a Malawi that is truly for all Malawians, a nation where every citizen feels valued, respected, and represented.
Enough is enough; stop the Northern Region Political Block and let us move forward together as one people, one nation.
Feedback:0992082424 Email:jonesgadama@gmail.com
Share this:
Like this:
LikeLoading…
Discover more from The Maravi Post
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker are back with another spot-on couples costume for Halloween … dressing up as Jack and Sally from “The Nightmare Before Christmas!” The pair absolutely crushed their looks, with Kourt even rocking a wig to…
Share this:
Like this:
LikeLoading…
Discover more from The Maravi Post
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Secretary General of CIVICUS, Mandeep Tiwana, at International Civil Society Week 2025. Credit: Civicus
BANGKOK, Nov 1 2025 (IPS) – It is a bleak global moment—with civil society actors battling assassinations, imprisonment, fabricated charges, and funding cuts to pro-democracy movements in a world gripped by inequality, climate chaos, and rising authoritarianism. Yet, the mood at Bangkok’s Thammasat University was anything but defeated.
Once the site of the 1976 massacre, where pro-democracy students were brutally crushed, the campus—a “hallowed ground” for civil society actors—echoed with renewed voices calling for defending democracy in what Secretary General of CIVICUS, Mandeep Tiwana, described as a “topsy-turvy world” with rising authoritarianism—a poignant reminder that even in places scarred by repression, the struggle for civic space endures.
“Let it resonate,” said Ichal Supriadi, Secretary General, Asian Democracy Network. “Democracy must be defended together,” adding that it was the “shared strength” that confronts authoritarianism.
Citing alarming figures, he spoke bluntly of the global imbalance in priorities—noting how military expenditure continues to soar even as civic space shrinks. He pointedly referred to the United States’ Ministry of Defense as the “Ministry of War,” comparing its USD 968 billion military budget with China’s USD 3 billion and noting that spending on the war in Ukraine had increased tenfold in just three years—a stark illustration of global priorities. “This is where we are with respect to peace and war,” he said gloomily.
Ichal Supriadi, Secretary General, Asian Democracy Network. Credit: Civicus
At another session, similar reflections set the tone for a broader critique of global power dynamics. Walden Bello, a former senator and peace activist from the Philippines, argued that the United States—especially under the Trump administration—had abandoned even the pretense of a free-market system, replacing it with what he called “overt monopolistic hegemony.” American imperialism, he said, “graduated away from camouflage attempts and is now unapologetic in demanding that the world bend to its wishes.”
Dr. Gothom Arya of the Asian Cultural Forum on Development and the Peace and Culture Foundation. Credit: Civicus
Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy, a Pakistani physicist and author, echoed the sentiment, expressing outrage at his own country’s leadership. He condemned Pakistan’s decision to nominate a “psychopath, habitual liar, and aggressive warmonger” for the Nobel Peace Prize, saying that the leadership had “no right to barter away minerals and rare earth materials to an American dictator” without public consent.
Hoodbhoy urged the international community to intervene and restart peace talks between Pakistan and India—two nuclear-armed neighbors perpetually teetering on the edge of renewed conflict.
But at no point during the day did the focus shift away from the ongoing humanitarian crises. Arya reminded the audience of the tragic loss of civilian lives in Gaza, the devastating fighting in Sudan that had led to widespread malnutrition, and the global inequality worsened by climate inaction. “Because some big countries refused to follow the Paris Agreement ten years ago,” he warned, “the rest of the world will suffer the consequences.”
That grim reality was brought into even sharper relief by Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi, a Palestinian physician and politician, who delivered a harrowing account of Gaza’s devastation. He said that through the use of American-supplied weapons, Israel had killed an estimated 12 percent of Gaza’s population, destroyed every hospital and university, and left nearly 10,000 bodies buried beneath the rubble.
“Even as these crises unfolded across the world, the conference demonstrated that civil society continues to persevere, as nearly 1,000 people from more than 75 organizations overcame travel bans and visa hurdles to gather at Thammasat University, sharing strategies, solidarity, and hope through over 120 sessions.
Among them was a delegation whose presence carried the weight of an entire nation’s silenced hopes—Hamrah, believed to be the only Afghan civil society group at ICSW.
“Our participation is important at a time when much of the world has turned its gaze away from Afghanistan,” Timor Sharan, co-founder and programme director of the HAMRAH Initiative, told IPS.
“It is vital to remind the global community that Afghan civil society has not disappeared; it’s fighting and holding the line.”
Through networks like HAMRAH, he said, activists, educators, and defenders have continued secret and online schools, documented abuses, and amplified those silenced under the Taliban rule. “Our presence here is both a statement of resilience and a call for solidarity.”
“Visibility matters,” pointed out Riska Carolina, an Indonesian woman and LGBTIQ+ rights advocate working with ASEAN SOGIE Caucus (ASC). “What’s even more powerful is being visible together.”
“It was special because it brought together movements—Dalit, Indigenous, feminist, disability, and queer—that rarely share the same space, creating room for intersectional democracy to take shape,” said Carolina, whose work focuses on regional advocacy for LGBTQIA+ rights within Southeast Asia’s political and human rights frameworks, especially the ASEAN system, which she said has historically been “slow to recognize issues of sexuality and gender diversity.”
“We work to make sure that SOGIESC (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Expression, and Sex Characteristics) inclusion is not just seen as a niche issue, but as a core part of democracy, governance, and human rights. That means engaging governments, civil society, and regional bodies to ensure queer people’s participation, safety, and dignity is part of how we measure democratic progress.”
She said the ICSW provided ASC with a chance to make “visible” the connection between civic space, democracy, and queer liberation and to remind people that democracy is not only about elections but also about “who is able to live freely and who remains silenced by law or stigma.”
Away from the main sessions, civil society leaders gathered for a candid huddle—part reflection, part reckoning—to examine their role in an era when their space to act was shrinking.
“The dialogue surfaced some tough but necessary questions,” he said. They asked themselves: ‘Have we grasped the full scale of the challenges we face?’ ‘Are our responses strong enough?’ ‘Are we expecting anti-rights forces to respect our rules and values?’ ‘Are we reacting instead of setting the agenda? And are we allies—or accomplices—of those risking everything for justice?’
But if there was one thing crystal clear to everyone present, it was that civil society must stand united, not fragmented, to defend democracy.
p class=”readrate” data-rr=”16″ style=”line-height: 1.2;” data-pm-slice=”1 1 []”>Two judges rule that it’s unlawful for President Trump to suspend SNAP food benefits. With higher premiums and a government shutdown, open enrollment for health insurance is different this year. Higher electricity prices are factoring into who voters in New Jersey and Virginia pick as their governors.
<
p class=”readrate” data-rr=”16″ style=”line-height: 1.2;”>
….Opposition, civil society, and international observers question the credibility of the October 29 polls as reports of violence, internet shutdowns, and irregularities dominate the aftermath.
DODOMA-(MaraviPost)-Tanzania’s National Electoral Commission has declared President Samia Suluhu Hassan the winner of the country’s highly contested October 29 election, securing an overwhelming 98 percent of the vote.
The announcement, made late Friday evening, has been met with both celebration among ruling party supporters and outrage from opposition figures who have labelled the election a “sham” marred by manipulation and intimidation.
The opposition and civil society organizations have rejected the results, alleging widespread irregularities, including ballot stuffing, restricted access for observers, and the detention of opposition polling agents.
Reports have also emerged of an extensive internet shutdown that coincided with the voting and counting periods, further fueling suspicions that the digital blackout was a deliberate attempt to block transparency and restrict communication.
In several regions, especially in opposition strongholds, witnesses have reported incidents of post-election violence involving clashes between protesters and security forces. Human rights groups have expressed alarm at the reports of beatings, arrests, and disappearances that have followed the declaration of results.
International observers from the African Union, the European Union, and several diplomatic missions have voiced serious concerns about the credibility of the process, citing limited access to polling stations and the lack of a level playing field for all candidates.
Despite the mounting criticism, President Samia Suluhu has called for unity and calm, urging Tanzanians to respect the verdict of the electoral body and move forward “as one nation under peace and democracy.”
However, opposition leaders have dismissed her appeal, insisting that democracy cannot exist without accountability and that the election results represent “a complete betrayal of the Tanzanian people’s will.”
Civil society groups have now called on the international community to intervene and support an independent review of the election results, warning that the country risks sliding into deeper political instability if grievances are ignored.
As tensions continue to rise across several regions, the government has deployed additional security forces to maintain order, while social media users report restricted access to platforms such as X, Facebook, and WhatsApp.
For many Tanzanians, the events surrounding this election echo painful memories of past polls where allegations of state interference overshadowed democratic aspirations.
With a 98 percent victory margin, questions continue to grow over whether the result reflects genuine popular support or the tightening grip of power by a government increasingly accused of silencing dissent.
The world now watches closely as Tanzania stands at a critical crossroads — between maintaining stability and restoring the people’s faith in democracy through transparency, justice, and reform.
Share this:
Like this:
LikeLoading…
Discover more from The Maravi Post
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.