Tackling the World’s Planetary Emergency

Civil Society, Climate Action, Climate Change, Environment, Featured, Global, Headlines, Human Rights, Humanitarian Emergencies, Sustainable Development Goals, TerraViva United Nations

Opinion

Tackling the Planetary Emergency: Supporting a Declaration of Planetary Emergency at the UN General Assembly and the Convening of a Planetary Emergency Platform

NEW YORK, Aug 26 2024 (IPS) – The world is facing a triple planetary crisis of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss.

Climate change continues to pose an existential threat to humanity, with recent science estimating that we have possibly less than six years left to change course and rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions to have a chance of avoiding the worst of the climate crisis.


Pollution is crippling air and water quality, exacerbating the inequality between wealthy and low-and middle-income countries. Biodiversity loss has the potential to collapse our food and water supply chains, putting further pressure on some of the most vulnerable countries in the world to manage the ever-growing risk of poverty, hunger, and harm to human health.

We also have scientific evidence that six of the nine core Planetary Boundaries have been crossed, posing a catastrophic danger to the Earth’s overarching ecosystem.

With this in mind, the Climate Governance Commission, supported by the Earth governance smart coalition Mobilizing an Earth Governance Alliance (MEGA), seeks to assist in catalyzing the implementation of critical reforms to global governance institutions for the effective management of the triple planetary crisis.

Probably the most significant and fundamental reform that could be established quickly and effectively would be a Declaration by the UN General Assembly of a Planetary Emergency and the convening of a Planetary Emergency Platform to facilitate global cooperation to address the emergency.

Adopting a Planetary Emergency Declaration would ensure that policy actions to protect the environment – especially the climate – would be elevated to top priority in global, national and local decision-making, requiring concerted action by all sectors of government, similar to the way that other critical emergencies are addressed.

Convening the Planetary Emergency Platform would help facilitate the development of cooperative plans for urgent action at all levels of governance on specific goals such as, for example, a global, fast-track de-carbonization package. The fact that we are indeed in a serious planetary emergency justifies and indeed requires an approach that can sufficiently address such an emergency.

Why declare a Planetary Emergency?

An emergency occurs when risks (impact X probability) are unacceptably high, and when time is a serious constraint. As identified by MEGA and the Climate Governance Commission based upon the best available science, we are at such a juncture. Consequently, with scientific evidence continuing to mount depicting the grave circumstances humanity finds itself in, the UN General Assembly, with the support of climate-vulnerable countries, should consider responding in kind, declaring a planetary emergency recognising this fundamental shift toward an emergency footing and moving quickly to convene an emergency platform to reflect these circumstances and facilitate urgent, coordinated action, with linked national emergency plans.

The growing urgency for declaring a planetary emergency stems from a history of a fragmented multilateral planetary policy system, that lacks a coordinated and ambitious response at the speed and scale required. Climate change to date has been treated as a peripheral issue dealt with primarily within a two-week framework every year at the climate COPs (Conference of the Parties), leading to a lack of effective cooperation between different aspects of the multilateral system and its domestic counterparts. Further, climate change solutions have not been adequately linked to mitigating pollution and biodiversity loss.

This siloed approach to handling the crisis as just another social and economic issue, rather than the interlinked and existential threat that it poses to society, illustrates how unequipped current governance structures are to handle this all-encompassing and systemic issue.

Consequently, global governance at present lacks the preparation and resilience necessary for current and future global shocks caused by the planetary emergency (e.g. extreme weather events, potential collapse of food supply chains, major economic crises, among other shock events).

However, this emergency also opens the door for the UN General Assembly and broader multilateral system to reconsider its framing of its approach and identify new governance mechanisms to address current gaps in the system. Governments and policymakers are now presented with an opportunity for transformation – to create a sustainable governance framework that facilitates the safe operation of humanity within its Planetary Boundaries.

Climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss and its related ecological, social, and economic problems are global issues, and thus require a whole-of-system approach to provide global solutions.

By recognizing that the world is in a state of acute distress through the Declaration of a Planetary Emergency at the UN General Assembly and thereby convening a Planetary Emergency Platform to coordinate a response to this emergency, policymakers would be provided with a framework needed to transcend current political divides to effectively address the challenges we face.

What would a Declaration of a Planetary Emergency at the UN General Assembly achieve?

We have already seen regional, national, and local climate emergency declarations issued across 2359 jurisdictions (as of August 2024). Such declarations by themselves have limited impact due to the global nature of this emergency. However, they demonstrate a keen interest in responding to the triple planetary crisis within an emergency framework, providing a core foundation for multilateral cooperation.

A Planetary Emergency Declaration would be science-led and action-focused, helping to elevate global planetary policy by connecting and elevating the existing declarations and filling the gaps in our current governance framework. Activating, focusing, and coordinating existing capacities at the UN through a Declaration of this kind could form a crucial aspect in ensuring that the Declaration is not merely a reflection of well-intended aspirations, but that it provides a solid basis for building effective, cooperative action.

A Planetary Emergency Declaration could build off and connect to its predecessors’ efforts and acknowledge all inter-connected risks associated with the triple planetary crisis in order to facilitate a global green transition. This would in turn allow for the Declaration to stimulate, support and facilitate cooperation and implementation of planetary policy at multilateral, national, and subnational levels.

The Declaration could seek primarily to achieve three things at the outset.

Firstly, as noted above, it could place the multilateral system on an acknowledged emergency footing, allowing for more ambitious action at all levels of governance, and reducing the current barriers to planetary progress.

Secondly, a Declaration could open the door for more effective emergency governance platforms including in particular the convening of a Planetary Emergency Platform, in line with the broader proposal of the UN Secretary General that emergency platforms be convened to strengthen the response to complex global shocks.

A Planetary Emergency Platform, using the Declaration as its basis, could be tasked with coordinating, defragmenting, and harmonizing the international community’s response to the triple planetary crisis. This would, in turn, speed up much needed solutions to the crisis, including, for example, the unlocking of greater climate finance and increased protection of crucial global commons under threat from human activity, from the Amazon to the High Seas.

A Platform of this kind would also be capable of developing a Planetary Emergency Plan, which could outline and bring into effect these desired outcomes, as well as assist with monitoring the implementation of the Declaration.

Finally, a Declaration of Planetary Emergency would allow for scientific concepts like Planetary Boundaries to become more familiar and integrated into our global policy responses, as well as creating vital opportunities to bridge the gap between planetary science and policy.

The Declaration could seek to ensure policymakers have greater impetus to take emergency action to protect these Planetary Boundaries, helping to generate political support and reduce geopolitical barriers to progress.

A Planetary Emergency Declaration at the UN General Assembly could serve as a crucial next step toward remedying the – to date – dysfunctional and inadequate nature of our response to the triple planetary crisis and convene a Planetary Emergency Platform as a key governance mechanism to facilitate the cooperation required between national and subnational entities to ensure effective and equitable planetary action.

Working with climate-vulnerable states, and global experts, the Climate Governance Commission and Mobilizing an Earth Governance Alliance will offer support to build a coalition to advance this Declaration at the UN General Assembly and accelerate our shared efforts to capably and effectively manage the global environment.

Eoin Jackson is Chief of Staff and Legal Fellow at the Climate Governance Commission and Co-Convenor of the Earth Governance ImPACT Coalition; Nina Malekyazdi is a Summer Intern at the Climate Governance Commission and a graduate in International Relations of the University of British Columbia

Source: Mobilizing an Earth Governance Alliance (MEGA)

MEGA is a coalition of civil society organizations working in cooperation with like-minded governments, legislators, experts, private sector actors and other stakeholders to strengthen existing environmental governance mechanisms and establish additional mechanisms. MEGA is led by the Climate Governance Commission and World Federalist Movement-Institute for Global Policy (co-hosts) in cooperation with 28 co-sponsoring organizations.

IPS UN Bureau

  Source

Things Can Only Get Better for Bangladesh

Asia-Pacific, Civil Society, Crime & Justice, Democracy, Economy & Trade, Headlines, Religion, TerraViva United Nations

Opinion

ROME, Aug 23 2024 (IPS) – The student movement in Bangladesh demanding reform of the quota system for public jobs was the straw that broke the camel’s back. The Awami League (AL) government led by Sheikh Hasina, in power continuously since 2008, collapsed on 5th August 2024. With Sheikh Hasina fleeing to India and leaving the country in disarray, her authoritarian rule of 15 years just melted away.


Saifullah Syed

Prior to this sudden and dramatic turn of events, during her rule, the country was mired by institutional and financial corruption, crony capitalism, authoritarian administration, and forced disappearance of opponents. In addition, the AL government of Sheikh Hasina monopolised all lucrative appointments and commercial privileges for people belonging to her party, banning political discourse and dissent.

She developed the personality cult of her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who led the country to independence in 1971 and who was brutally murdered on 15th of August 1975. The personality cult was so perverse that liberation of the country was attributed to Sheikh Mujib alone and all the other stalwarts of the liberation war and her party were ignored. Everything of significance happening in the country was attributed to his wisdom and foresight alone and were often named after him. Every Institution, including schools across the country and embassies around the world were obliged to host a “Mujib corner” to display his photo, and books about him only.

Yet, no political party, including the leading opposition Bangladesh National Party (BNP) succeeded in mobilising an uprising against Hasina’s regime. This was partly due her ability to project AL and her government as the sole guarantor of independence, sovereignty and secularism. Everyone else was cast as a supporter of anti-liberation forces, being communal, and accused of being motivated to turn the country into a hotbed of Islamic extremism. BNP was also accused of committing crimes and corruption when it was in power.

The founder of BNP is linked to the cruel murder of Sheikh Mujib and the members of her family, and the current leader of BNP is accused of masterminding the grenade attack aimed at killing Sheikh Hasina at an AL rally on 21st August 2004. Hasina survived the attack, but it killed 24 people and injured about 200.

Why did the student movement succeed ?

Like most historical events there are several factors, but the ultimate ones were that (i) the students were willing to die and (ii) the Military displayed patriotism and wisdom by refusing to kill. The students came from all walks of life, transcending party lines and economic background. Hence, attempts to cast them as anti-liberation did not succeed. The army refused to kill to protect a despotic ruler. Bangladeshis have always overthrown dictatorial rulers.

Why the students were ready to die and the army refused to kill are important issues for analysis but the critical question right now is: what next and where do we go from here ?

What Next for Bangladesh ?

The students have shown support for the formation of an interim government with leading intellectuals, scholars and elite liberal professionals and civil society actors under the leadership of Dr Younus, the founder of the Grameen Bank and a Nobel Laureate. These people were previously silenced and harassed during Hasina’s 15 year rule.

Many people remain sceptical, however. Many fear collapse of law and order and communal disturbances in the short run, which may lead to the emergence of another dictatorial rule. Neighbouring India, which supported Hasina’s government, is concerned about the rights of minorities in Bangladesh, although they showed scant concern for the minorities in India in the recent past.

Political and geo-political analysts are busy analysing the geo-political implications and the role of key players in mobilising the students to overthrow Hasina. This is raising questions about who engineered the Regime Change.

Fortunately for Bangladesh and the Bangladeshis, things can get only better. None of the short-term concerns have materialised. No major collapse of law and order nor oppression of minorities have taken place, barring a few localised incidents. Regarding the long run, things can only get better: it is extremely unlikely that another leader can emerge with reasons to substantiate a “moral right to rule”, disdain political discourse and project a personality cult – the basic ingredients of a dictatorial regime.

Hasina embodied several factors which were intrinsically associated with who she was. It is unlikely that anyone else with a similar background will emerge again. She started as a champion of democracy by seeking to overthrow the military rule that followed the murder of her father, then as a champion of justice by seeking justice for the killing of her father. Over time, however, she became a despot and a vengeful leader. Even if AL manages to regroup and come to power, it will be obliged to have a pluralistic attitude and not identify with Sheikh Mujib alone. All the stalwarts of the party have to be recognised, as only by recognising the forgotten popular figures of the party can it re-emerge.

Regarding the wider geo-political play by bigger powers, it may be important but cannot take away the fact that the majority of people are in favour of the change and are happy about it. It could be similar to gaining independence in 1971. India helped Bangladesh to gain independence because of its own geo-political strategic objective, but it has not reduced the taste of independence. If Bangladeshis’ desire coincides with the objective of others’ then so be it. It is win-win for both.

Eventually, Bangladesh will emerge with robust basic requirements for the protection of the institutions to safeguard democracy, such as independent judiciaries, a functioning parliamentary system with effective opposition parties, vibrant media and civil society organisations. It will become a country that will recognise the collective conscience of the leading citizens and intellectuals and establish good governance and social justice. The economy may go through some fluctuations due to troubles in the financial sector and export market, but a robust agriculture sector, vibrant domestic real estate market and remittances will keep it afloat.

The author is a former UN official who was Chief of Policy Assistance Branch for Asia and the Pacific of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

  Source

Pizza Hut Statistics 2024 By Employment, Education, Device Traffic, Sales And Brand Awareness


Pizza Hut Statistics 2024 By Employment, Education, Device Traffic, Sales And Brand Awareness
August 17, 2024

Introduction

Pizza Hut Statistics: Pizza Hut is one of the most popular quick-service fast-food restaurants around the world. Pizza Hut ranked second by selling the highest number of pizzas in the United States of America as of 2022. The varieties of pizzas offered by Pizza Hut are mouthwatering, making it a long-known brand in the competition. This brand has become one of the best quick-service restaurants globally in 2023. Let’s dive into the Pizza Hut Statistics quickly.

Editor’s Choice

  • Domino’s Pizza, Pizza Hut, and Little Caesars were the top Pizza chains in the USA in 2022, generating the highest sales of $8,571.9, $5,269.7, and $4,724.3, respectively.
  • By 2023, the American customer satisfaction index for Pizza Hut Restaurants had decreased to 78 over the last 10 years.
  • In November 2023, pizzahut.com had 26.64 million global traffic, which was 5.29% higher than October 2023, totaling 28.13 million.
  • 46.5% of employees had at least a high school diploma, while 20.2% had a bachelor’s degree.

What is Pizza Hut?

Pizza Hut is an American multinational fast-food restaurant chain headquartered in Texas, USA, founded by Frank and Dan Carney in 1958. Today, it is owned by Yum! Brands, Inc., offering a menu including chicken wings, pizzas, fries, pasta, desserts, breadsticks, and tacos.

Pizza Hut Facts

  • The name “Pizza Hut” was chosen because it fit perfectly on their signage with only 8 letters.
  • Pizza Hut was the pioneer in offering online pizza orders.
  • The first Pizza Hut restaurant now operates as a museum.
  • In 2001, Pizza Hut delivered pizza to the International Space Station.
  • Pizza Hut consumes over 300 million pounds of cheese annually.

General Pizza Hut Statistics

  • In November 2023, pizzahut.com had 26.64 million global traffic, showing a 5.29% increase from October 2023.
  • By 2023, Pizza Hut had generated $5,487 billion in sales and operated more than 6,561 stores in the USA.

Pizza Hut Statistics by Employment

  • Females constituted 56.9% of the workforce compared to 43.1% males.
  • 64.7% of employees were white, followed by Hispanic or Latino (14%), Black or African American (11.8%), and Asian employees (6.2%).
  • 7% of employees were under 18 years old, with the majority (46%) falling in the 20-30 age bracket.

Pizza Hut Statistics By Education

degrees-of-pizza-hut-employees

(Reference: zippia.com)

Most employees had at least a high school diploma (46.5%), followed by a bachelor’s degree (20.2%), an associate degree (18%), and a diploma (9.9%). A small percentage had certificate education or master’s degrees.

Pizza Hut Statistics By Device Traffic

pizzahut-com-website-traffic-by-country

(Source: Semrush.com)

The United States of America generates the most traffic on pizzahut.com and its online delivery app, followed by Indonesia, Germany, Colombia, and Canada in terms of website traffic numbers over the last 6 months of 2023.

During this period, mobile online delivery apps accounted for 88.41% of the traffic, equivalent to 23 million users worldwide, while desktop traffic was only 11.59%, representing 3 million users.

Pizza Hut Statistics By Initial Franchise Investment in the USA

initial-franchise-investments-for-pizza-hut-in-the-united-states-in-2022

(Source: statista.com)

In 2022, Pizza Hut’s major franchise investments in the USA included building and site improvements ($1,575,000), equipment ($300,000), and small wares ($50,000), with a total estimated investment cost of $2,063,500.

Online Food Delivery Bookings by Brand in the USA

online-food-delivery-bookings-by-brand-in-the-u-s-as-of-september-2023

(Source: statista.com)

Pizza Hut holds a 32% market share in online food delivery bookings in the USA as of September 2023, ranking among the top 5 brands, while DoorDash (69%), Domino’s (47%), and Uber Eats (45%) lead the market. GrubHub accounts for 23% of the online food delivery bookings in September 2023.

American Customer Satisfaction Index Score by Brand For Leading Quick Service Restaurants

american-customer-satisfaction-index-scores-for-leading-quick-service-restaurant-chains-in-the-united-states-in-2023-by-restaurant-brand

(Source: statista.com)

In 2023, Pizza Hut achieved a high customer satisfaction score of 78 in the USA, placing it among the top 10 brands. Chick-fil-A leads the satisfaction scores with a notable 85 points.

Leading Fast Food Restaurant Chain by Brand Value

eading-restaurant-brands-worldwide-in-2023-by-brand-value

(Reference: statista.com)

One of the leading restaurant brands worldwide in 2023 according to Pizza Hut Statistics is valued at 5.88 billion. The top three ranked brands are Starbucks (53.43 billion), McDonald’s (36.86 billion), and KFC (17.66 billion).

Leading Quick Service Pizza Chains in the USA by Sales

-leading-quick-service-pizza-chains-in-the-united-states-in-2022-by-sales-in-million-u-s-dollars

(Reference: statista.com)

Ranked Pizza chains in the USA for 2022 in terms of sales are Domino’s Pizza, Pizza Hut, and Little Caesars, with sales of $8,571.9, $5,269.7, and $4,724.3 respectively. Other pizza brands like Papa John’s Marco’s Pizza, Papa Murphy’s, also made it to the list with high sales figures.

Pizza Hut Statistics By Brand Awareness

pizza-hut-brand-awareness-usage-popularity-loyalty-and-buzz-among-restaurant-chain-customers-in-the-united-states-in-2022

(Reference: statista.com)

Brand awareness statistics for Pizza Hut in the USA shows 95% awareness, but only 43% popularity among Americans. Out of these, 34% have tried Pizza Hut, and 28% are loyal customers. The brand generated buzz among 27% of Americans.

Leading Restaurant Chains by Brand Awareness in 2022

leading-restaurant-chains-ranked-by-brand-awareness-in-the-united-states-in-2022

(Reference: statista.com)

McDonald’s leads in brand awareness among fast-food chains in the USA with 95%, followed by KCF, Burger King, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut, each with 94% awareness. These statistics indicate successful brand awareness efforts for all the mentioned chains, with over 50% awareness in each case.

Pizza Hut Statistics by Calorie by Product

Pizza Hut Pasta Calories (kcal) Fat (g) Carbs (g) Protein (g)
Oven Baked Chicken Alfredo Pasta, 1 serving 930 49 85 37
Oven Baked Italian Meats Pasta, 1 serving 860 37 97 36
Penne with Mariana and Meatballs, half 630 28 62 33
Oven Baked Veggie Pasta, 1 serving 640 16 99 27
Oven Baked Cheesy Alfredo Pasta, 1 serving 880 48 84 30
Pizza Hut Pizza Calories (kcal) Fat (g) Carbs (g) Protein (g)
American Chicken Club Pizza, Large Thin ‘N Crispy Slice,1 serving 340 18 31 14
American Chicken Club Pizza, Large Original Pan, 1 serving 430 24 38 16
American Chicken Club Pizza, Large Original Stuffed Crust Slice, 1 serving 400 21 37 16
American Chicken Club – Personal Pan Pizza Slice, 1 serving 180 8 18 7
American Chicken Club Pizza, Large Hand Tossed Slice, 1 serving 370 18 36 15
Pizza Hut Desserts Calories (kcal) Fat (g) Carbs (g) Protein (g)
Cheery Dessert Pizza, 1 serving 240 4 47 4
Apple Dessert Pizza, 1 serving 250 4 50 4
Pizza Hut Breadsticks Calories (kcal) Fat (g) Carbs (g) Protein (g)
Breadsticks, 1 serving 140 4.50 19 4
Bakery Style Breadsticks, 1 serving 150 5 22 5
Breadsticks with Extra Cheese 210 10 21 10
Old fashioned Breadsticks – large 200 6 27 9
Breadstick Appetizer Sampler, 1 serving 930 38 118 30
Pizza Hut Chicken Calories (kcal) Fat (g) Carbs (g) Protein (g)
Buffalo Medium Traditional Bone- in Wing, 1 serving 100 4.50 5 9
Baked Bone-Out Wing, 1 serving 60 2 4 5
Buffalo Burnin’ hot traditional bone-in Wing, 1 serving 100 4.50 5 9
Buffalo Burnin’ Hot Bone-Out Wing, 1 serving 90 4 9 5
Buffalo Medium Bone-Out Wing, 1 serving 90 4 9 5
Pizza Hut Sandwich Calories (kcal) Fat (g) Carbs (g) Protein (g)
Buffalo Chicken Sandwich with Fries, 1 serving 1550 75 179 41
Black Forest Ham and Cheese Sandwich with Straight Cut fries, 1 serving 1170 53 132 39
Black Ham and Cheese Sandwich with Potato Chips, 1 serving 850 39 88 37
Black Forest Ham and Cheese Diablo Sandwich with Straight Cut Fries, 1 serving 1170 53 133 39
Black Forest Ham and Cheese Diablo Sandwich with Potato Chips, 1 serving 860 39 89 38

(Source: fatsecret.com)

Conclusion

Providing a wide range of food options, Pizza Hut stands out as a notable fast-food chain globally. Their diverse menu attracts millions of customers due to its affordability. While not yet the market leader in sales and brand recognition, Pizza Hut consistently ranks within the top 10 across various metrics. The enduring popularity of pizza ensures continuous demand, and brands like Pizza Hut are poised to remain successful. With ambitious strategies for future growth, Pizza Hut has much to offer in the years to come.

<div class="border-b-[3px] border-t-[3px] p-4 border-[#1d598f] my-4″ style=”box-shadow: 0 0 14px rgb(9 38 66 / 8%);”>

Sources

What is the requirement for obtaining a Pizza Hut franchisee?

The individual or business should have $700,000 net worth and $350,000 liquid assets. Moreover, a strong credit report and history are required.

Is Pizza Hut Expensive?

Compared to other brands, Pizza Hut offers relatively pocket-friendly pizzas and other menu items. However, depending on the area, the prices may be similar or lesser.

Which is the most popular item at Pizza Hut?

Pepperoni Pizza is the most popular pizza at Pizza Hut.

Pizza Hut Statistics 2024 By Employment, Education, Device Traffic, Sales And Brand Awareness

Data is from 2023 and 2024 and forecast data is for 2025 and 2026. We also expand the forecast data to 2027 and 2028.


——

REFERENCES:

This information was taken from various sources around the world, including these countries:

Australia, Canada, USA, UK, UAE, India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Kenya, US, United Kingdom, United States of America, Malaysia, U.S., South Africa, New Zealand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates.

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antarctica, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan.

Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bermuda, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bouvet Island, Brazil, British Indian Ocean Territory, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi.

Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Cayman Islands, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling Islands), Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Cote D’Ivoire (Ivory Coast), Croatia (Hrvatska), Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic.

Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, East Timor, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Falkland Islands (Malvinas), Faroe Islands, Fiji, Finland, France, Metropolitan, French Guiana, French Polynesia, French Southern Territories.

Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guam, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Heard and McDonald Islands, Honduras, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy.

Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, North Korea, South Korea, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg.

Macau, Macedonia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Martinique, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montserrat, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar.

Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, Netherlands Antilles, New Caledonia, New Zealand (NZ), Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Niue, Norfolk Island, Northern Mariana Islands, Norway.

Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Pitcairn, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Reunion, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe.

Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands, Spain, Sri Lanka, St. Helena, St. Pierre and Miquelon, Sudan, Suriname, Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria.

Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tokelau, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Turks and Caicos Islands, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates (UAE), UK (United Kingdom), USA (United States of America, U.S.), US Minor Outlying Islands.

Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican City State (Holy See), Venezuela, Vietnam, Virgin Islands (British), Virgin Islands (US), Wallis and Futuna Islands, Western Sahara, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Pizza Hut Statistics 2024 By Employment, Education, Device Traffic, Sales And Brand Awareness
August 17, 2024

Source