Gateway to universal access to SRHR is human right to health

sexual and reproductive health, rights
sexual and reproductive health, rights

SHOBHA SHUKLA – CNS

The human right to health is not a privilege, tt is a legal obligation – rooted in international human rights law – and must form the foundation of all efforts toward universal access, equity, and justice. Protecting, implementing, and enforcing this right is essential for the wellbeing of women, girls, and all gender-diverse peoples.

Yet, across the world, sexual and reproductive health, rights and justice (SRHRJ) are increasingly under threat. Regressive policies, shrinking civic space, and a weakening of global solidarity are rolling back hard-won gains, particularly for those already on the margins.

According to UN Women, nearly one-in-four countries experienced a backlash against women’s rights in 2024 alone. From abortion restrictions and defunding of SRHRJ programmes to rising attacks on gender-diverse peoples, the erosion of rights has become systemic. The urgency to act – and to act together – has never been greater.

Translate rights into access and principles into practice

“Operationalising the demands of the right to health requires more than commitments on paper,” said Alison Drayton, Assistant Secretary General, CARICOM, Guyana, stressing the need for systems, partnerships, and accountability mechanisms. CARICOM refers to the Caribbean Community, a grouping of 21 countries (15 member countries and 6 associate members) in the Americas and the Caribbean.

“Through our multilateral cooperation on universal health coverage, gender equality, and reproductive and sexual health, we must collectively translate rights into access and principles into practice. We are investing in integrated primary healthcare, gender-responsive budgeting, and data systems that make inequities visible and actionable. But this journey is not easy,” she said.

For Alison, the core challenge is ensuring that people remain at the centre of health systems. “Health is not a privilege – it is the foundation of humanity and sustainability. Every woman should be able to give birth safely, every adolescent should have access to accurate information, and every person – regardless of gender, income, or geography – should be able to lead a healthy life. Let us be bold in our vision and reaffirm that health, equity, and rights are indispensable – and that our collective responsibility is to make them real for every community we serve.”

What does the right to health mean?

“The right to health is not simply an obligation – it is a deep commitment,” explained Dr Haileyesus Getahun, founder and Chief Executive Officer of the Global Center for Health Diplomacy and Inclusion (CeHDI). Dr Getahun also leads HeDPAC (Health Development Platform for Africa and the Caribbean) that works with like-minded governments, particularly in Africa and the Caribbean regions, to forge South-South partnerships that address pressing health challenges and achieve universal health coverage. He earlier served the UN health agency, the World Health Organization (WHO) for over two decades, and was the founding Director of Quadripartite Joint Secretariat on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). AMR is among the top 10 global health threats.

Dr Getahun underscored that the right to health has been enshrined in several international treaties, including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, ratified by 174 countries.

“It entails three key obligations for governments,” he said. “First, they must respect by not interfering with citizens’ enjoyment of their health and wellbeing. Second, they must protect by ensuring that no harm is brought to this enjoyment. And third, they must fulfill these obligations by establishing administrative systems that ensure every person in their country can realise this right.”

Dr Getahun describes the right to health as the gateway to universal health coverage, encompassing all services for all people without discrimination. “Sexual and reproductive health is an integral part of that right,” he said.

International instruments like the legally-binding treaty adopted in 1979 – the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), further reinforce these commitments.

“We need to remind our governments that they have signed these international obligations,” he said. “Countries like Brazil, Canada, Cuba, Mexico, and El Salvador have shown how partnerships and learnings can lead to real progress. We can do more, we can do better, if we work together.”

Brazil’s rights-based model

One of the countries that has made notable progress in advancing the right to health through rights-based approaches is Brazil. Dr Ana Luiza Caldas, Brazil’s Vice Minister of Health shared how her country’s community-based primary healthcare approach has strengthened universal health coverage. “For the past 35 years, we have focused on connecting with the people we serve. Listening to communities and understanding what people actually need helps us design responsive SRH programmes – like providing free condoms in schools and health units.”

She stressed that access to quality healthcare is a human right, not a privilege. “Policies must be shaped by people’s needs. When we listen, we build trust and inclusion.”

“Access to quality healthcare should never be a privilege – it is a human right,” she re-emphasised. “By working in partnerships and staying close to the people, we can make that right real.”

Long walk to gender justice

For Aysha Amin, Founder of Baithak (Challenging Taboo) Pakistan, the right to health remains a distant dream for women and girls in marginalised communities. “Despite SRHRJ being so crucial for everyone, especially young girls and women, it is still not a priority. This is not just a health issue – it is a gender justice issue,” she said.

She highlighted how gender inequality and climate change intersect to compound vulnerability. “In communities most affected by climate disasters, health systems collapse. Floods wash away medical facilities. Women give birth in unsafe, makeshift conditions. Adolescent girls manage menstruation without facilities for water, sanitation and hygiene – often under open skies, risking infections and gender-based violence. This is a serious violation of dignity and safety.”

For Amin, the path forward requires centring the lived experiences of women and girls. “We need to create safe spaces where young women not only receive information but also reflect, question, and demand their rights. Building leadership among women and girls is essential so they can hold local governments accountable – especially in times of disaster.”

She also called for a shift in male engagement strategies, which often remain superficial. “In countries like Pakistan, decisions about women’s bodies are still made by men. We need to engage men as allies – challenging patriarchal norms and rethinking masculinity – thus helping to create space for women in decision-making, not take those spaces away. Male engagement must move beyond tokenism to transformative change.”

Amin also underscored the need for qualitative data to complement statistics. “Numbers alone cannot show what it means when an unmarried woman is denied care, or when a transgender person is refused access, or when a woman with disability is unable to access healthcare. Their stories reveal the intersectional inequalities that health systems must address.”

Countering media silence and anti-rights narratives

In many societies, SRHRJ remains taboo – not because people do not experience these issues, but because they are deemed unfit for public discourse.

“In my country, Indonesia, we cannot talk openly about comprehensive sexuality education,” said Betty Herlina, an Indonesian journalist and Founder Editor of Bincang Perempuan (Bahasa-language media focussed on gender justice). She is also a noted SRHRJ advocate. “If I distribute a condom in public, people would say that I am ‘promoting free sex.’ That is the bias we must break.”

Herlina urged media professionals to frame SRHRJ as a public health and human rights issue, not a moral or political one.

Patriarchy and harmful gender biases within and through media

Herlina noted that media indifference is part of the problem. “Not all media houses want to cover SRHRJ – it is not seen as an ‘attractive’ topic.” She urged media professionals to frame SRHRJ as a public health and human rights issue, and not as a moral or political one.

“While reporting on unplanned pregnancies or abortion, journalists must remember that women still have the right to medical care. It is our duty to verify government claims and bring evidence-based narratives to the public,” said Herlina.

She added that data-driven journalism can counter misinformation around SRHRJ and push for policy change. “We need to document stories of people affected by restrictive policies to humanise these issues.”

We need to counter harmful gender biases, norms and stereotypes and challenge patriarchy within and through media.

Betty Herlina was also conferred upon the 1st Prize in Asia Pacific Region: SHE & Rights Media Awards 2025 at the International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP 2025) in Bogota, Colombia. SHE & Rights is together hosed by CeHDI, ICFP 2025, IPPF, ARROW, WGNRR, CNS and partners. Sai Jyothirmai Racherla, Deputy Executive Director of Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW) conferred the award citation to Betty Herlina at ICFP Live Stage in presence of Dr Haileyesus Getahun and others.

Reclaiming health as a human right

For Dr Tlaleng Mofokeng, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, this right is far from abstract – it is a living testimony to justice, autonomy, and equity.

“Our health systems must be inclusive, gender-responsive, and grounded in human rights. But around the world, access to SRH services is being restricted, healthcare workers are being silenced, and ideology is replacing evidence,” she said.

She cautioned that conditional funding – where financial aid depends on limiting support for certain groups – undermines human rights. “Funding cannot be conditional. Maternal health, SRH, and universal health coverage must not be seen as competing agendas. They are interconnected and part of the same promise of human dignity,” she asserted.

Dr Mofokeng urged governments and global institutions to invest in equity and intersectionality. “We must ensure that adolescents, LGBTIQ+ persons, people with disabilities, migrants, and others at the margins are not left behind. Health diplomacy must serve justice, not conditionality. Our movements need comprehensive, unrestricted resources to continue their work.”

The way forward

The Right to Health provides a moral and legal compass for achieving gender equality. But realising it requires political will, inclusive governance, collective action and sustained investment. As the world grapples with climate crises, rising inequalities, and anti-rights movements, reaffirming health as a human right becomes a powerful act of resistance and hope.

Ensuring that no one is left behind means building systems that listen to communities, amplify marginalised voices, and turn commitments into action. The right to health is not merely about survival – it is about freedom, justice, and the promise of a fairer world.

Shobha Shukla – CNS (Citizen News Service)

(Shobha Shukla is a feminist, health and development justice advocate, and an award-winning founding Managing Editor and Executive Director of CNS (Citizen News Service). She was also the Lead Discussant for SDG-3 at United Nations inter-governmental High Level Political Forum (HLPF 2025). She is a former senior Physics faculty of prestigious Loreto Convent College; current President of Asia Pacific Regional Media Alliance for Health, Gender and Development Justice (APCAT Media); Chairperson of Global AMR Media Alliance (GAMA received AMR One Health Emerging Leaders and Outstanding Talents Award 2024); and Host of SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights). Follow her on Twitter/X @shobha1shukla or read her writings here www.bit.ly/ShobhaShukla)

–              Shared under Creative Commons (CC)


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Political prostitute Brown Mpinganjira dumps MCP for DPP

Brown Mpinganjira, political prostitute

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-James Brown Mpinganjira, a seasoned politician and former MCP stalwart, has defected to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), citing the party’s commitment to the welfare of Malawians.

However, not everyone is welcoming Mpinganjira’s move, with political commentator Mathews Namukhoyo urging the DPP to exercise caution.

According to Mpinganjira, his decision to leave the MCP was motivated by the party’s failure to deliver on its promises to Malawians.

“It was just a waste of time to be in MCP as it failed Malawians,” Mpinganjira said, adding that, “But DPP is the only party that has the heart of Malawians, and I’m excited to be part of a team that is working tirelessly to improve the lives of our people.”

However, Mpinganjira’s track record has raised eyebrows, with many questioning his motives for joining the DPP.

Mpinganjira previously defected from the DPP to the MCP, where he campaigned vigorously for the party and disparaged the DPP, claiming it would not win. Now, he’s singing a different tune, sparking accusations of opportunism.

Namukhoyo, a vocal political commentator, has cautioned the DPP against welcoming Mpinganjira, describing him as a “greedy and prostitute politician.” “DPP should not allow any greedy politicians who just want to harvest when they didn’t sow,” Namukhoyo warned , adding that, “The party should work only with those who risked their lives and refused monetary incentives from MCP.”

Namukhoyo’s sentiments are echoed by many who feel that Mpinganjira’s defection is a blatant attempt to jump on the DPP bandwagon.

“These are people who were eating well in MCP, and now they’re coming to DPP just because they smell food,” said one MCP supporter, adding that, ”We shouldn’t forget that Mpinganjira was one of the most vocal MCP supporters when it suited him. Why should we trust him now?”

The DPP has yet to comment on Mpinganjira’s defection, but the party’s leadership will likely face pressure to clarify its stance on the matter.

As the party considers Mpinganjira’s application, it remains to be seen whether it will heed Namukhoyo’s warning or give Mpinganjira a chance to prove himself.

One thing is certain, however: Mpinganjira’s defection has sparked controversy, and only time will tell if it’s a wise move or a misstep.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Nuclear Disarmament Conversations Cannot Lose Traction

Active Citizens, Civil Society, Editors’ Choice, Featured, Global, Headlines, Human Rights, Humanitarian Emergencies, IPS UN: Inside the Glasshouse, Nuclear Disarmament, Peace, TerraViva United Nations

Nuclear Disarmament

Titan II ICBM - decommissioned nuclear missile - at the Titan Missile Museum, Green Valley, Sahuarita, Arizona. Credit: Stephen Cobb/Unsplash

Titan II ICBM – decommissioned nuclear missile – at the Titan Missile Museum, Green Valley, Sahuarita, Arizona. Credit: Stephen Cobb/Unsplash

UNITED NATIONS, Nov 6 2025 (IPS) – In recent days, nuclear state leaders have flouted the regulations and norms around nuclear non-proliferation and are flirting more openly with nuclear might in the name of projecting strength.


In the last week, the United States and the Russian Federation have made public shows of their nuclear messaging. On the 27th of October, President Vladimir Putin revealed a new nuclear-powered missile capable of staying airborne far longer than conventional missiles and even evading missile defense systems. Some experts have suggested that this is meant to reinforce Russia’s nuclear might, which Putin has leaned on since the start of the Ukraine invasion in February 2022.

More recently, on 29 October, President Donald Trump announced via social media that he wanted to resume nuclear testing for the first time in thirty years. In his post he wrote, “Because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis.”

As he made this announcement just before his meeting with President Xi Jinping, some experts have considered that China’s expanding nuclear arsenal has prompted some calls in Washington D.C. to quickly modernize the U.S.’s own nuclear forces. Nuclear testing by major powers like China, Russia or the U.S. has not been conducted in decades. Yet analyses have warned that such an act would only further complicate relations between this triad.

All these developments should not come as a surprise. Even as countries have been aware of the dangers of nuclear weapons since 1945, this has not completely stopped them from expanding their forces. As of June 2025, there are over 12,400 nuclear warheads in the world in only a small percentage of countries. The U.S. and Russia account for 90 percent of those warheads, both possessing more than 5,000 nuclear warheads. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), nearly all nine of the nuclear states moved to modernize their existing nuclear arsenals and acquire new missiles in 2024.

Increasing geopolitical tensions have increased feelings of uncertainty and instability, which seems to have led countries to prioritize national security. The nuclear-armed states have made moves to expand the capabilities of their arsenals. SIPRI estimates that China now owns 600 nuclear warheads. Both the United Kingdom and France have ongoing programs to develop strategic weapons, including missiles and submarines. North Korea continues to expand its military nuclear program, accelerating the production of fissile material to make more nuclear warheads.

Headlines reflecting concerns around nuclear testing. Credit: IPS

Concerns about nuclear testing have been reflected in headlines. Credit: IPS

The threat of nuclear weapons seemed to loom over major events this year, even as their efficacy as a deterrent was thrown into question. As India and Pakistan engaged in aerial battles and strategic strikes in May, the conflict demonstrated to the world how close two nuclear powers could come to war.

Meanwhile, in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine and the perceived threat from Russia, European nations, including France and the U.K., are moving to prioritize investments in defense, including deterrence. Germany, Denmark and Lithuania are among some of the countries that have also expressed interest in hosting nuclear weapons for the nuclear states.

William Potter, Director of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, expressed concern over the dangers posed by nuclear weapons due to miscalculations and misperceptions at a time when “there is a total lack of trust, respect, and empathy among the nuclear weapons possessors.”

“The more nuclear weapons, the greater the risk of their inadvertent use, but even more dangerous is the absence of a political climate in which serious arms control and disarmament measures can be pursued,” Potter told IPS.

The safeguards for nuclear arms control are also being challenged. The NEW-Start treaty, the last remaining arms control treaty between the U.S. and Russia, is set to expire in February 2026, though both countries have considered voluntarily maintaining the limits on deployed strategic nuclear weapons for one year. Yet in this past week, that promise has been undercut by both parties.

At the same time, there are the continuous calls for nonproliferation and disarmament. Advocates from all over have raised awareness on the impacts of radiation on communities, on public safety and on the environment. The United Nations has platformed and rallied these advocates and has raised the alarm for disarmament since its official beginning on 24 October, 1945.

Amidst this, there is the fear of a new nuclear arms race. During the high-level meeting on the elimination of nuclear weapons in September this year, the UN’s Chef de Cabinet Courtenay Rattray, who delivered remarks on behalf of Secretary-General António Guterres, said that the world was “sleepwalking” into this new arms race, now defined by new technologies and new domains for conflict such as cyberspace. Rattney warned that “the risks of escalation and miscalculation are multiplying.”

So if the nuclear states are modernizing their arsenals, how do modern technologies fit in? Artificial intelligence (AI) is the latest frontier that countries are navigating and investing significant resources in to achieve progress. Given that, national and global regulations on the safe governance of AI are still nascent as countries still work to agree on universal agreements for the frameworks for the ethical applications of AI.

As it becomes increasingly sophisticated and more accessible, member states have been investing resources into incorporating AI in the military domain. Given that it does not fit neatly into pre-existing deterrence frameworks, this has also raised concerns over AI’s possible “destabilizing effects,” according to Wilfred Wan, Director of the SIPRI Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme.

It has prompted stakeholders to engage in serious negotiations on AI governance in the military domain, including guardrails to reduce the risk of escalation, Wan told IPS. At the multilateral level, he cites the example of the Blueprint for Action that came out of the second summit on Responsible AI in the Military Domain (REAIM) in 2024. It is a non-binding agreement among 61 countries, including nuclear powers like the U.S., the U.K., France and Pakistan, that provides a framework for the responsibility that parties need to take in integrating AI, and recognizing gaps that policymakers must take into account. There is also the UN General Assembly Resolution 79/239 on “[AI] in the military domain and its implications for international peace and security.”

“This is certainly not a substitute for disarmament progress, but in the current strategic context, it can help rebuild some of the trust and confidence necessary for revitalizing those efforts,” Wan said.

Researchers from SIPRI have found there are no governance frameworks specifically for the nuclear-AI nexus compared to those for conventional military systems. “In the nuclear context, discussions have largely centered on retaining human control in nuclear decision-making. This is an essential principle but does not address other ways in which AI integration can affect the environment in which nuclear decisions are made, directly or indirectly,” Wan explained.

“Absent a framework that addresses these aspects, including through regulatory and technical measures, there remains the risk of accelerated integration of AI among nuclear-armed states in a manner that destabilizes the security environment, threatens strategic stability, and impacts the risk of nuclear use.”

When assessing the existing approaches to the governance of military AI, it shows common areas of concern, such as raising awareness through multi-stakeholder engagement and preserving the capacity for human intervention, along with applying safety and security measures to mitigate escalation risks.

At this time, nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation are critical and may even provide insight into negotiating the governance of AI in nuclear forces. The approaches to fostering multi-stakeholder dialogue that include policymakers, non-nuclear states, experts and the private sector could similarly apply to discussions around AI in nuclear forces. Though it should be noted that their limited knowledge of nuclear force structures may constrain meaningful contributions to the debate. Nevertheless, their participation must be facilitated if nuclear parties truly value human control in this factor.

Nuclear and non-nuclear states must recommit to the anti-nuclear agreements, including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Potter stressed the importance of disarmament and nonproliferation education, particularly to empower future generations to “pursue creative ways to reduce pressing nuclear dangers.”

The UN can employ its influence in advancing disarmament efforts through dialogue and awareness efforts from the General Assembly and the Office of Disarmament Affairs (UN-ODA). The UN has also confirmed it will convene an independent scientific panel to assess the effects of nuclear warfare and an Expert Group on Nuclear-Free War Zones.

“Nuclear disarmament is more important today than ever before, but it is not simply a question of securing lower numbers of nuclear weapons,” Potter said. “At a time when the “nuclear taboo” has been eroded and discussions about the use of nuclear weapons have been normalized, it is vital that policymakers act boldly in a fashion commensurate with the threat.”

IPS UN Bureau Report

Note: This article is brought to you by IPS Noram in collaboration with INPS Japan and Soka Gakkai International in consultative status with ECOSOC.

  Source

Nankhumwa challenges DPP to demonstrate “Proven Leadership” notion amid numerous crises

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Member of Parliament (MP) for Mulanje Central, Kondwani Nankhumwa, has called on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leadership to demonstrate its capability by addressing the country’s pressing challenges, including the ongoing fuel crisis, water shortages, and other critical national issues.

Speaking in Parliament on Thursday, Nankhumwa emphasized the need for the government to take decisive action to ease the suffering of Malawians.

He said the current situation demands “proven leadership that delivers real solutions, not just promises.”

“The people of Malawi are looking to us for answers. We must show that we have the capacity and commitment to tackle these problems head-on,” Nankhumwa said.

The legislator urged the DPP leadership to rise to the occasion and provide tangible results, noting that citizens are losing patience with continued hardships.

Nankhumwa’s remarks come amid growing public frustration over persistent shortages of fuel ,water and daily blackouts which have disrupted daily life and economic activities across the country.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

State Of The Shutdown, SCOTUS Tariff Arguments, Chicago ICE Ruling

President Trump calls on Senate Republicans to end the government shutdown by scrapping the filibuster, even as he admits the standoff hurt the party in this week’s elections. The Supreme Court hears arguments on whether Trump overstepped his authority by imposing tariffs under a decades-old emergency powers law. And in Chicago, federal judges side against the administration in immigration enforcement cases, ordering cleaner detention centers and tighter limits on the use of force.

Want more comprehensive analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.

<

p class=”readrate”>Today’s episode of Up First was edited by Jason Breslow, Krishnadev Calamur Cheryl Corely, Mohamad ElBardicy, and Alice Woelfle.

<

p class=”readrate”>

<

p class=”readrate”>It was produced by Ziad Buchh, Nia Dumas and Christopher Thomas

<

p class=”readrate”>

<

p class=”readrate”>

<

p class=”readrate”>

<

p class=”readrate” data-rr=”17″ data-pm-slice=”1 1 []”>We get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. And our technical director is David Greenburg.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post

Federal creation for Malawi calls revived: Wandale petitions Parliament

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-President for People’s Land Organization Vincent Wandale on Wednesday afternoon, November 5, 2025 presented a petition to the National Assembly of Malawi, calling for a national debate on the proposed establishment of the Federal Republic of the United States of Malawi.

Wandale personally delivered the letter to the Sergeant-at-Arms, Major Kaliati, at Parliament Building in Lilongwe.

Wandale told The Maravi Post that the petition outlines his call for open discussions on federalism as a potential framework for Malawi’s future governance.

In his submission, Wandale also addressed concerns surrounding the oath of allegiance sworn by Members of Parliament to the Republic of Malawi.

He further proposed the creation of a new institution, the Order of the Worldwide Holy Mbamirian Empire Including Self-Governing Dominions (OWED), which he described as a symbolic structure aimed at promoting unity and self-determination.

Speaking after delivering the petition, Wandale emphasized that his initiative seeks to inspire national reflection on Malawi’s constitutional identity and political direction.


Discover more from The Maravi Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The Maravi Post